Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839262›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2020

Quality and safety of parenteral nutrition for newborn and preterm infants as an on-ward preparation.

Isabelle Sommer, Lucie Bouchoud, Markoulina Berger-Gryllaki, Pascal Bonnabry, Farshid Sadeghipour

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Standard formulas and individualised parenteral nutrition preparations in very low birth weight infants.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle SommerDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lucie BouchoudDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Geneva HUG, Geneva, Switzerland.
Markoulina Berger-GryllakiDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal BonnabrySchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences EPGL, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Farshid SadeghipourDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Lausanne CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor newborn and preterm infants, standardised and individual parenteral nutrition (PN) is used. PN preparation is at risk for contamination and dosing errors. The quality of PN is crucial for infants and has a direct impact on their health status and safety. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the physicochemical and microbial quality of PN for newborn and preterm infants prepared on a neonatal ward.

methodsSampling of various individual PN prepared by nurses on a neonatal ward was performed. Formulations included maximal four electrolytes, variable dextrose and amino acid concentrations. Depending on the sample volume, up to three quality analyses were performed: (1) test for bacterial endotoxins by kinetic-chromogenic method, (2) sterility according to the European and US Pharmacopoeia, and (3) quantification of electrolytes by capillary electrophoresis and of dextrose by ultraviolet detection after enzymatic reaction of hexokinase. The concentrations obtained were evaluated based on the US and Swiss Pharmacopoeia specifications for compounded preparations and compared to the widened pharmacy specifications.

resultsThe composition of 86% of the 110 analysed PN prepared by nurses on the neonatal ward corresponded to their medical prescription. 14% were out of the acceptable widened pharmacy ranges. We found no microbial contamination in the samples. All PN were free from endotoxins.

conclusionComponent concentrations of PN prepared on wards by nurses differed frequently and significantly from their medical prescription, and the deviation can be critical depending on the component and its mode of action. The sample size is too small to evaluate the microbial contamination.

Indexed as

Nurse's RoleQuality ControlDrug ContaminationElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureParenteral NutritionParenteral Nutrition SolutionsParenteral Nutrition Solutionscompositionendotoxinmicrobial contaminationneonatologypreterm infantquality of parenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID32839262
PMCPMC7447241
OpenAlexW2920471606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.