Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839250›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

Analysis of Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by Specimen Transport Media, Nucleic Acid Extraction Reagents, Detergents, and Fixatives.

Stephen R Welch, Katherine A Davies, Hubert Buczkowski, Nipunadi Hettiarachchi, Nicole Green, Ulrike Arnold, Matthew Jones, Matthew J Hannah, Reah Evans, Christopher Burton and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modified transport medium for improving influenza virus detection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Stephen R Welch *High Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine A Davies *High Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Hubert Buczkowski *High Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Nipunadi HettiarachchiHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Nicole GreenHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Ulrike ArnoldHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew JonesHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J HannahHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Reah EvansHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher BurtonHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Jane E BurtonHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Malcolm GuiverVirology Department, Clinical Sciences Laboratory, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Manchester Public Health Laboratory, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Patricia A CaneHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Neil WoodfordNIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Christine B BruceHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Allen D G RobertsHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom.
Marian J KillipHigh Containment Microbiology, NIS Laboratories, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, United Kingdom marian.killip@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3828-3371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a multifaceted rapid response by the scientific community, bringing researchers, health officials, and industry together to address the ongoing public health emergency. To meet this challenge, participants need an informed approach for working safely with the etiological agent, the novel human coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Work with infectious SARS-CoV-2 is currently restricted to high-containment laboratories, but material can be handled at a lower containment level after inactivation. Given the wide array of inactivation reagents that are being used in laboratories during this pandemic, it is vital that their effectiveness is thoroughly investigated. Here, we evaluated a total of 23 commercial reagents designed for clinical sample transportation, nucleic acid extraction, and virus inactivation for their ability to inactivate SARS-CoV-2, as well as seven other common chemicals, including detergents and fixatives. As part of this study, we have also tested five filtration matrices for their effectiveness at removing the cytotoxic elements of each reagent, permitting accurate determination of levels of infectious virus remaining following treatment. In addition to providing critical data informing inactivation methods and risk assessments for diagnostic and research laboratories working with SARS-CoV-2, these data provide a framework for other laboratories to validate their inactivation processes and to guide similar studies for other pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsBetacoronavirusCell SurvivalChlorocebus aethiopsClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFiltrationHumansIndicators and ReagentsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsVirus InactivationIndicators and Reagentsbiosafetyclinical diagnosticscoronavirusCOVID-19diagnosticsinactivationlysis buffersmolecular extraction reagentssafety testingSARS-CoV-2specimen transport tubes

Identifiers

PMID32839250
PMCPMC7587104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.