Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839218›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020

An Open-Label Study of the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single Oral and Intravenous Doses of Omadacycline.

Steven J Kovacs, Lillian Ting, Jens Praestgaard, Gangadhar Sunkara, Haiying Sun, Daniel S Stein, S Ken Tanaka, Stephen Villano

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial Management of SevereInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Omadacycline successfully treated severeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy of omadacycline in the treatment ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Omadacycline for the treatment of patients withFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven J KovacsNovartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Lillian TingNovartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Jens PraestgaardNovartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Gangadhar SunkaraNovartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Haiying SunNovartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Daniel S SteinNovartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
S Ken TanakaParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA ken.tanaka@paratekpharma.com.
Stephen VillanoParatek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Novartis (United States) · USParatek Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omadacycline is a once-daily oral or intravenous (i.v.) aminomethylcycline antibiotic approved in the United States for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) in adults. Omadacycline pharmacokinetics were characterized in 18 patients with hepatic impairment and 12 matched healthy subjects. Patients with hepatic impairment received i.v. omadacycline at 100 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 50 mg (moderate and severe hepatic impairment) and oral omadacycline at 300 mg (mild hepatic impairment) or 150 mg (moderate hepatic impairment); oral omadacycline was not evaluated in those with severe hepatic impairment. Safety monitoring included the collection of adverse events (AEs), performance of laboratory tests, determination of vital signs, and performance of electrocardiograms. Omadacycline exposures were similar in patients with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects following i.v. or oral administration, with the geometric mean ratios for the area under the concentration-time curve and the maximum drug concentration ranging from 0.79 to 1.42. Omadacycline was safe and well tolerated. Overall, 13/30 (43.3%) participants experienced an AE; those occurring in more than 1 participant included headache (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), infusion-site pain (6.7%), contusion (6.7%), and dizziness (6.7%), with no differences based on the degree of hepatic impairment or the route of administration. Asymptomatic increases in heart rate were observed; none was considered an AE. These findings suggest that no omadacycline dose adjustment is warranted in patients with hepatic impairment.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsLiver DiseasesAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultArea Under CurveHumansTetracyclinesomadacyclineTetracyclinesaminomethylcyclinehepatic impairmentomadacyclinepharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32839218
PMCPMC7577144
OpenAlexW3081489746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.