ArticleJournal of the American Society of Cytopathology
SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas of the head and neck region: a cytopathologic characterization.
Article in Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications of EZH2 in Nasal Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- SMARCB1-deficient poorly differentiated testicular carcinoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Outcomes of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma: Largest single-center cross-sectional study.Head & neck · 2024Article
- Article
- INI1-Deficient Thyroid Carcinoma is an Aggressive Disease with Epithelioid and Rhabdoid Phenotype. A Case Report, Survey of INI1 Expression in Thyroid Lesions and Literature Review.Head and neck pathology · 2021Review
- Cytomorphologic Spectrum of SMARCB1-Deficient Soft Tissue Neoplasms.American journal of clinical pathology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSMARCB1 encodes for a component of the SWI/SNF complex and is widely implicated in carcinogenesis. In the head and neck, SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas typically arise in the sinonasal tract but can be found at other sites. EZH2 inhibitors have emerged as potential targeted therapy against SWI/SNF-deficient tumors. We sought to characterize the cytomorphology of head and neck carcinomas with SMARCB1 deficiencies to identify potential candidates for targeted therapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsHead and neck carcinomas with SMARCB1 mutations were retrospectively identified and confirmed to be SMARCB1-deficient by both molecular (fluorescent in-situ hybridization or next generation sequencing) and immunohistochemical means. Cases with positive cytology were reviewed and their cytologic features cataloged.
resultsA total of 19 specimens from 13 patients were reviewed, including 8 specimens from 7 sinonasal carcinomas, 4 specimens from 3 thyroid carcinomas, 3 specimens from 2 skin carcinomas, and 4 specimens from 1 carcinoma of unknown primary origin. High-grade features were common, including mitoses (11 of 19) necrosis (13 of 19) and multinucleation (16 of 19). Tumors showed either dense cytoplasm with distinct cell borders (10 of 19) or delicate cytoplasm with indistinct cell borders (9 of 19). Most tumors showed no distinct epithelial differentiation (12 of 19), while some (7 of 19) showed glandular or signet ring features. A minor cohort demonstrated rhabdoid cells (4 of 19).
conclusionsHead and neck carcinomas with SMARCB1 deficiencies have a wide array of morphologies and tend to demonstrate high-grade features. Only a minor cohort demonstrate rhabdoid-type cells. Evaluation of SMARCB1 deficiency for potential targeted therapy should not be limited to tumors with rhabdoid morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.