Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838839›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Social interactions drive efficient foraging and income equality in groups of fish.

Roy Harpaz, Elad Schneidman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dissecting Larval Zebrafish Hunting using Deep Reinforcement Learning Trained RNN Agents.Proceedings of the ... Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding collective behavior through neurobiology.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Systems Neuroscience of Natural Behaviors in Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roy HarpazDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9587-3389
Elad SchneidmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8653-9848

Funding

European Research Council 311238Human Frontier Science Program RGP0065/2012Israeli Science Foundation 1629/12Israel Science Foundation 1629/12Simons Foundation 542997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social interactions underlying group foraging and their benefits have been mostly studied using mechanistic models replicating qualitative features of group behavior, and focused on a single resource or a few clustered ones. Here, we tracked groups of freely foraging adult zebrafish with spatially dispersed food items and found that fish perform stereotypical maneuvers when consuming food, which attract neighboring fish. We then present a mathematical model, based on

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleModels, Spatial InteractionSpatial BehaviorZebrafishbehavioral modelingcollective behaviorcomputational biologyinformation processingphysics of living systemssocial foragingsocial interactionssystems biologyzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID32838839
PMCPMC7492088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.