Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838779›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Perceptions and processes influencing the transition of medical students from pre-clinical to clinical training.

Bunmi S Malau-Aduli, Poornima Roche, Mary Adu, Karina Jones, Faith Alele, Aaron Drovandi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Near-Peer Anatomy-Anchored Teaching.The clinical teacher · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bunmi S Malau-AduliCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia. bunmi.malauaduli@jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6054-8498
Poornima RocheCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia.
Mary AduCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia.
Karina JonesCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia.
Faith AleleCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia.
Aaron DrovandiCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Australia.
James Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition from pre-clinical to clinical medical training is often characterised by several challenges which may have different impacts on students' well-being and learning experiences. To ensure smooth transition, it's important to understand how these students navigate through the challenging processes.

methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods design using a survey, focus groups and interviews among medical students who had entered their first clinical year of study (Year 4). Using a 5-point Likert scale, survey participants rated items which related to their transition experience in the areas of professional socialisation; workload; patient contact; knowledge and skills; and learning and education. The qualitative questions explored challenges in transition, coping strategies and recommendations to foster smooth transitioning. The survey data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics while thematic analysis was used to establish emerging themes from the qualitative data. The Westerman Transition Framework was utilised in the triangulation of study findings.

resultsA total of 141 students participated in the survey while 12 students participated in the focus group discussions and interviews. The quantitative part of the study showed that the students were anxious about the process and considered the workload to be heavy while also identifying gaps in their knowledge. Similarly, the qualitative findings revealed that workload and professional socialisation were identified as disruptive novel elements and the students also reported feelings of inadequacy and incompetence due to perceived knowledge gaps. These shortcomings and challenges were tackled by seeking support from peers and senior medical students as a way of coping with the anxiety and stress. As the students progressed, they admitted and accepted that the transition was a gradual process and an essential learning curve.

conclusionThe process of transitioning from preclinical to clinical years is considered stressful and abrupt with the introduction of disruptive novel elements that create feelings of incompetence and unpreparedness in students. Educators need to consider developing social and developmental strategies that emphasise nurturing and empowering clinical learning environments and facilitate reflective and transformative life-long learning opportunities for students.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalClinical CompetenceFocus GroupsHumansLearningPerceptionQualitative ResearchClinical transitionMedical educationStudentsTransition framework; education

Identifiers

PMID32838779
PMCPMC7446158
OpenAlexW3080468594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.