Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838775›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

A prospective study evaluating the integration of a multifaceted evidence-based medicine curriculum into early years in an undergraduate medical school.

B Kumaravel, H Jenkins, S Chepkin, S Kirisnathas, J Hearn, C J Stocker, S Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrating Practice-Changing Studies in Gynaecologic Oncology Through Clinical Illustrations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B KumaravelUniversity of Buckingham Medical School, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK. Bharathy.kumaravel@buckingham.ac.uk.
H JenkinsThames Valley Deanery, Oxford, UK.
S ChepkinEast and North Hertfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
S KirisnathasUniversity of Buckingham Medical School, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.
J HearnManchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
C J StockerUniversity of Buckingham Medical School, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.
S PetersenUniversity of Buckingham Medical School, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of ensuring medical students are equipped with the skills to be able to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been increasingly recognized in recent years. However, there is limited information on an effective EBM curriculum for undergraduate medical schools. This study aims to test the feasibility of integrating a multifaceted EBM curriculum in the early years of an undergraduate medical school. This was subsequently evaluated using the validated Fresno test and students' self-reported knowledge and attitudes as they progressed through the curriculum.

methodsEBM was integrated horizontally and vertically into the curriculum into the first 2 years of undergraduate medical school. First year medical students were recruited to participate in the study. The 212-point Fresno test was administered along with a locally developed questionnaire at baseline before EBM teaching in year one and at the end of EBM teaching in year two.

resultsThirty-one students participated at baseline and 55 students participated at the end of second year EBM teaching. For the 18 students who completed the Fresno at both time points, the average score increased by 38.7 marks (p < 0.001) after EBM teaching. Students felt confident in formulating clinical questions and in critically appraising journal articles after EBM teaching. EBM was perceived to be important to their future practice as a doctor and for improving patient outcomes at both time points.

conclusionsIt has been feasible to integrate a multifaceted, EBM curriculum from the first year of an undergraduate medical program. Early evaluation of the curriculum using the Fresno test has shown a significant increase in students' EBM knowledge. The curriculum also demonstrated an increase in students' perceptions of the clinical relevance of EBM in their developing practice.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumEvidence-Based MedicineHumansProspective StudiesSchools, MedicalCompetencyEBMEvidence-based medicineFresno testKnowledgePerceptionsUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID32838775
PMCPMC7445898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.