Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838394›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

First-attempt intubation success and complications in patients with COVID-19 undergoing emergency intubation.

Julio Cesar Garcia de Alencar, Bruno Marques, Julio Flavio Meirelles Marchini, Lucas Oliveira Marino, Sabrina Correa da Costa Ribeiro, Cauê Gasparotto Bueno, Victor Paro da Cunha, Felippe Lazar Neto, Fernando Salvetti Valente, Hassan Rahhal and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julio Cesar Garcia de AlencarEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Bruno MarquesEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Julio Flavio Meirelles MarchiniEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Lucas Oliveira MarinoEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Sabrina Correa da Costa RibeiroEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Cauê Gasparotto BuenoEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Victor Paro da CunhaEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Felippe Lazar NetoEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Fernando Salvetti ValenteEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Hassan RahhalEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Juliana Batista Rodrigues PereiraEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Eduardo Messias Hirano PadrãoEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Annelise Passos Bispos WanderleyEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Millena Gomes Pinheiro CostaEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Rodrigo Antonio Brandão NetoEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Heraldo Possolo SouzaEmergency Department Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the first-attempt success rates and complications of endotracheal intubation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients by emergency physicians. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted from March 24, 2020 through May 28, 2020 at the emergency department (ED) of an urban, academic trauma center. We enrolled patients consecutively admitted to the ED with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 submitted to endotracheal intubation. No patients were excluded. The primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success, defined as successful endotracheal tube placement with the first device passed (endotracheal tube) during the first laryngoscope insertion confirmed with capnography. Secondary outcomes included the following complications: hypotension, hypoxemia, aspiration, and esophageal intubation. Results: A total of 112 patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were enrolled. Median age was 61 years and 61 patients (54%) were men. The primary outcome, first-attempt intubation success, was achieved in 82% of patients. Among the 20 patients who were not intubated on the first attempt, 75% were intubated on the second attempt and 20% on the third attempt; cricothyrotomy was performed in 1 patient. Forty-eight (42%) patients were hypotensive and required norepinephrine immediately post-intubation. Fifty-eight (52%) experienced peri-intubation hypoxemia, and 2 patients (2%) had cardiac arrest. There were no cases of failed intubation resulting in death up to 24 hours after the procedure. Conclusion: Emergency physicians achieve high success rates when intubating COVID19 patients, although complications are frequent. However, these findings should be considered provisional until their generalizability is assessed in their institutions and setting.

Indexed as

COVID‐19emergency physicianintubation

Identifiers

PMID32838394
PMCPMC7436702
OpenAlexW3048962357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.