Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838226›Full record

ReviewAWWA water science

Considerations for large building water quality after extended stagnation.

Caitlin R Proctor, William J Rhoads, Tim Keane, Maryam Salehi, Kerry Hamilton, Kelsey J Pieper, David M Cwiertny, Michele Prévost, Andrew J Whelton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AWWA water science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Decision support tools for water reuse: a systematic review.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Water Quality Trade-offs for Risk Management Interventions in a Green Building.Environmental science : water research & technology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence ofEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic onInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Editorial: Special Issue: "Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Two-Year Evaluation ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. ControllingMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  18. Environmental Monitoring ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caitlin R ProctorDivision of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Materials Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana.
William J RhoadsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia.
Tim KeaneLegionella Risk Management, Inc. Chalfont Pennsylvania.
Maryam SalehiDepartment of Civil Engineering University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee.
Kerry HamiltonSchool of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment Arizona State University Tempe Arizona.
Kelsey J PieperDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Northeastern University Boston Massachusetts.
David M CwiertnyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seamans Center for the Engineering Arts and Sciences University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa.
Michele PrévostCivil, Geological and Mining Engineering Polytechnique Montreal Montréal Québec Canada.
Andrew J WheltonLyles School of Civil Engineering, Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana.

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unprecedented number of building closures related to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is concerning because water stagnation will occur in many buildings that do not have water management plans in place. Stagnant water can have chemical and microbiological contaminants that pose potential health risks to occupants. Health officials, building owners, utilities, and other entities are rapidly developing guidance to address this issue, but the scope, applicability, and details included in the guidance vary widely. To provide a primer of large building water system preventative and remedial strategies, peer-reviewed, government, industry, and nonprofit literature relevant to water stagnation and decontamination practices for plumbing was synthesized. Preventative practices to help avoid the need for recommissioning (e.g., routine flushing) and specific actions, challenges, and limitations associated with recommissioning were identified and characterized. Considerations for worker and occupant safety were also indicated. The intended audience of this work includes organizations developing guidance.

Indexed as

advisorybuildingcoronavirusCOVID‐19customerdisasterdisinfectionflushinghealth riskplumbingrecommissioningSARSSARS‐CoV‐2stagnationwater quality

Identifiers

PMID32838226
PMCPMC7323006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.