Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838159›Full record

ReviewSN comprehensive clinical medicine2020

Ozone (O3) and SARS-CoV-2: Physiological Bases and Their Therapeutic Possibilities According to COVID-19 Evolutionary Stage.

Marcos Edgar Fernández-Cuadros, María Jesús Albaladejo-Florín, Daiana Peña-Lora, Sandra Álava-Rabasa, Olga Susana Pérez-Moro

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SN comprehensive clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Compassionate Use of Rectal Ozone (OSN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Effect of Rectal Ozone (OSN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcos Edgar Fernández-CuadrosCalle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, CP28009 Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-9075
María Jesús Albaladejo-FlorínCalle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, CP28009 Madrid, Spain.
Daiana Peña-LoraUnidad de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Álava-RabasaCalle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, CP28009 Madrid, Spain.
Olga Susana Pérez-MoroCalle del Maestro Vives 2 y 3, Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina, CP28009 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, there is no definitive treatment for the new SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Three evolutionary stages in SARS-CoV-2 infection are recognized (early infection, pulmonary phase, and systemic hyper inflammation), with characteristic clinical signs and symptoms. There are 80 international experimental trials underway seeking effective treatment for the COVID-19 pandemic. Of these, there are only three that consider ozone therapy (major auto hemotherapy) as an alternative option. There is no study that evaluates rectal ozone insufflation, despite being a safe, cheap, risk-free technique. That technique is a systemic route of ozone administration (95-96%) and that could be extrapolated to the use of SARS-CoV-2, given the excellent results observed in the management of Ebola. Ozone has four proven biological properties that could allow its use as an alternative therapy in the different phases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ozone could inactivate the virus by direct (O3) or indirect oxidation (ROS and LOPs) and could stimulate the cellular and humoral immune systems, being useful in the early COVID-19 infection phase (stages 1 and 2a). Ozone improves gas exchange, reduces inflammation, and modulates the antioxidant system, so it would be useful in the hyper inflammation or "cytokine storm" phase, and in the hypoxemia and/or multi-organ failure phase (stage 2b and stage 3). Given the current pandemic, it is urgent to carry out an experimental study that confirms or rules out the biological properties of ozone and thus allows it to be an alternative or compassionate therapy for the effective management of SARS-Cov-2 infection. The Ethical Committee at our Hospital has authorized the use of this technique for compassionate management of SARS-CoV-2 infection, considering the four biological Ozone properties exposed previously.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19OzonePandemicSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32838159
PMCPMC7340747
OpenAlexW3038157852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.