ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
Postoperative, Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: recommendations from the DEGRO Dermatooncology Working Group.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Hand.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Clinical benefit of adding radiation for immune checkpoint inhibitor-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: A 27-patient analysis.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2026Article
- One dose of adjuvant 8 Gray postoperative radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma excised with narrow margins: Low toxicity and comparable efficacy to conventional radiotherapy.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2026Article
- No Association Between Radiation Dose and Clinical Outcomes in Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the Veteran Population.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A novel patient-specific solution for Merkel cell carcinoma in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Article
- A single dose of neoadjuvant radiation for Merkel cell carcinoma: Complete pathologic response with minimal morbidity in a rapidly growing lesion of the eye.JAAD case reports · 2025Article
- Improved survival at the population level for patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma following availability of immunotherapy.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025Article
- Hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for merkel cell carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Review
- The Evolving Treatment Landscape of Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Best practices in surgical and nonsurgical management of head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: An update.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2023Article
- Scientific and clinical developments in Merkel cell carcinoma: A polyomavirus-driven, often-lethal skin cancer.Journal of dermatological science · 2022Review
- Review
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Current State of Treatment and Future Directions.Cancers · 2021Review
- How we treat Merkel cell carcinoma: within and beyond current guidelines.Future oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- In Regard to Barker.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- Unconventional Wisdom?Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConventionally fractionated, postoperative radiation therapy (cPORT; 50 Gy in 25 fractions) is considered for patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) to improve locoregional control. However, cPORT is associated with acute toxicity, especially in the head and neck (H&N) region, and requires daily treatments over several weeks. We previously reported high rates of durable local control with minimal toxicity using 8-Gy single-fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) in the metastatic setting. We report early results on a cohort of patients with localized H&N MCC who received postoperative SFRT if a cPORT regimen was not feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients with localized MCC of the H&N (clinical/pathologic stages I-II) and no prior radiation therapy to the region were identified from an institutional review board-approved prospective registry who underwent surgical resection followed by postoperative SFRT. Time to event was calculated starting from the date of resection before SFRT. The cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional recurrences and out-of-field recurrences was estimated with death as a competing risk.
resultsTwelve patients with H&N MCC were identified with clinical/pathologic stages I-II H&N MCC. Median age at diagnosis was 81 years (range, 58-96 years); 25% had immunosuppression. At a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 8-34), there were no in-field locoregional recurrences. A single out-of-field regional recurrence was observed, which was successfully salvaged. There were no MCC-specific deaths. No radiation-associated toxicities greater than grade 1 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5) were observed.
conclusionsPreliminary data suggest that SFRT could offer a potential alternative to cPORT to treat the primary site for localized H&N MCC, particularly in elderly or frail patients, with promising in-field local control and minimal toxicity. Further data with validation in larger cohorts are needed to confirm the sustained safety and efficacy of postoperative SFRT.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.