Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838069›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Postoperative, Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Maclean M Cook, Stephanie K Schaub, Peter H Goff, Alex Fu, Song Y Park, Daniel S Hippe, Jay J Liao, Smith Apisarnthanarax, Shailender Bhatia, Yolanda D Tseng and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: recommendations from the DEGRO Dermatooncology Working Group.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Hand.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Evolving Treatment Landscape of Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. In Regard to Barker.Advances in radiation oncology
    Article
  18. Unconventional Wisdom?Advances in radiation oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maclean M CookUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Stephanie K SchaubDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Peter H GoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Alex FuUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Song Y ParkUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Daniel S HippeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Jay J LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Smith ApisarnthanaraxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Shailender BhatiaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Yolanda D TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Paul T NghiemUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Upendra ParvathaneniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Understand & overcome resistance to PD-1P01CA225517 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PAUL NGHIEM · 2019 to 2026
$22.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA225517NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConventionally fractionated, postoperative radiation therapy (cPORT; 50 Gy in 25 fractions) is considered for patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) to improve locoregional control. However, cPORT is associated with acute toxicity, especially in the head and neck (H&N) region, and requires daily treatments over several weeks. We previously reported high rates of durable local control with minimal toxicity using 8-Gy single-fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) in the metastatic setting. We report early results on a cohort of patients with localized H&N MCC who received postoperative SFRT if a cPORT regimen was not feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients with localized MCC of the H&N (clinical/pathologic stages I-II) and no prior radiation therapy to the region were identified from an institutional review board-approved prospective registry who underwent surgical resection followed by postoperative SFRT. Time to event was calculated starting from the date of resection before SFRT. The cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional recurrences and out-of-field recurrences was estimated with death as a competing risk.

resultsTwelve patients with H&N MCC were identified with clinical/pathologic stages I-II H&N MCC. Median age at diagnosis was 81 years (range, 58-96 years); 25% had immunosuppression. At a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 8-34), there were no in-field locoregional recurrences. A single out-of-field regional recurrence was observed, which was successfully salvaged. There were no MCC-specific deaths. No radiation-associated toxicities greater than grade 1 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5) were observed.

conclusionsPreliminary data suggest that SFRT could offer a potential alternative to cPORT to treat the primary site for localized H&N MCC, particularly in elderly or frail patients, with promising in-field local control and minimal toxicity. Further data with validation in larger cohorts are needed to confirm the sustained safety and efficacy of postoperative SFRT.

Identifiers

PMID32838069
PMCPMC7373007
OpenAlexW3045376278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.