ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020
Application of randomization techniques for balancing site covariates in the adult day service plus pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the implementation process of the Adult Day Services Plus program.BMC geriatrics · 2025Trial
- Embedding Caregiver Support Within Adult Day Services: Outcomes of a Multisite Trial.The Gerontologist · 2024Trial
- Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Research Challenges and Potential Solutions in Relation to Key Areas of Care.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2022Trial
- Fidelity matters: implementing ADS Plus, an evidence-based program, in multiple adult day service sites.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Toward a payment model for augmenting Adult Day Services (ADS) with caregiver support: costs, willingness, and ability to pay for the ADS Plus program.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Exploration of the Content and Structure of Preferences for Leisure Activities of People Receiving Adult Day Services Using Concept Mapping.The Gerontologist · 2024Article
- Qualitative Analysis of Implementation Factors of an Embedded Caregiver Support Intervention into Adult Day Services.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Using Hybrid Effectiveness Studies to Facilitate Implementation in Community-Based Settings: Three Case Studies in Dementia Care Research.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2024Article
- Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Research Challenges and Potential Solutions in Relation to Key Areas of Care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Pragmatic trials in long-term care: Research challenges and potential solutions in relation to key areas of care.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)Article
- "This is Slowly Becoming my Interest…": The Understanding of Leisure and Preferences for Leisure Activities of People Receiving Adult Day Services.Research on agingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly common in pragmatic trials of interventions for older adults, where staff of existing clinics or service agencies deliver interventions. The Adult Day Service (ADS) Plus intervention is delivered by trained staff at adult day service facilities to assist older adults with cognitive impairments and their family caregivers. Because sizable imbalances on important site characteristics might emerge from a simple randomization, we implemented a 3-stage constrained randomization approach to limit imbalance between intervention and usual care control conditions on 5 site characteristics: capacity; % of minority clients; % of clients with dementia; urban, rural or suburban location; and private or public ownership. In stage 1, the Balance Match Weighted (BMW) re-randomization procedure was used to assign 30 sites to ADS Plus or control arms based on the best randomization out of 20 total randomizations for minimizing site imbalance. In stage 2, propensity scores from the BMW logistic regression analysis for reserve sites were used to determine substitutions for randomized sites that opted out of the CRT prior to implementation. In stage 3, a minimization approach was used to add 20 more sites to the trial. A standardized metric based on the half-normal distribution of the absolute value of mean differences was used to assess site imbalance. After stage 3, the remaining imbalance for the 49 enrolled sites was reduced by 75% from what would have been expected from a simple randomization. Optimized randomization procedures with similar imbalance metrics should be used more routinely in pragmatic CRTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.