Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32838052›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020

Application of randomization techniques for balancing site covariates in the adult day service plus pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.

David L Roth, Jin Huang, Laura N Gitlin, Joseph E Gaugler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David L RothCenter on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, 2024 East Monument Street, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Jin HuangCenter on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, 2024 East Monument Street, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Laura N GitlinCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, 1601 Cherry Street, Mail Stop 10501, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, USA.
Joseph E GauglerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St. SE, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Abraham Aizer Brody · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
Improving Outcomes for Family Caregivers and Older Adults with Complex Conditions: The Adult Day Service Plus ProgramR01AG049692 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GAUGLER, JOSEPH E., GITLIN, LAURA N. · 2016 to 2020
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049692NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly common in pragmatic trials of interventions for older adults, where staff of existing clinics or service agencies deliver interventions. The Adult Day Service (ADS) Plus intervention is delivered by trained staff at adult day service facilities to assist older adults with cognitive impairments and their family caregivers. Because sizable imbalances on important site characteristics might emerge from a simple randomization, we implemented a 3-stage constrained randomization approach to limit imbalance between intervention and usual care control conditions on 5 site characteristics: capacity; % of minority clients; % of clients with dementia; urban, rural or suburban location; and private or public ownership. In stage 1, the Balance Match Weighted (BMW) re-randomization procedure was used to assign 30 sites to ADS Plus or control arms based on the best randomization out of 20 total randomizations for minimizing site imbalance. In stage 2, propensity scores from the BMW logistic regression analysis for reserve sites were used to determine substitutions for randomized sites that opted out of the CRT prior to implementation. In stage 3, a minimization approach was used to add 20 more sites to the trial. A standardized metric based on the half-normal distribution of the absolute value of mean differences was used to assess site imbalance. After stage 3, the remaining imbalance for the 49 enrolled sites was reduced by 75% from what would have been expected from a simple randomization. Optimized randomization procedures with similar imbalance metrics should be used more routinely in pragmatic CRTs.

Indexed as

ADS, Adult Day ServiceAVDM, Absolute Value of the Standardized Difference in the MeanBMW, Balance Match WeightedCluster-randomized trialsCovariate-constrained randomizationCRT, Cluster-Randomized TrialFamily caregivingHalf-normal distributionPragmatic trialsRe-RandomizationSD, Standard DeviationSQRT, Square Root

Identifiers

PMID32838052
PMCPMC7385904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.