ReviewEthics, medicine, and public health
Choosing which COVID-19 patient to save? The ethical triage and rationing dilemma.
Review in Ethics, medicine, and public health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological, economic, and ethical factors in human feedback for a chatbot-based smoking cessation intervention.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The application of machine learning algorithms for predicting length of stay before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Wuhan-area hospitals.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Call for amendment ofJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2024Article
- Covid-19 triage in the emergency department 2.0: how analytics and AI transform a human-made algorithm for the prediction of clinical pathways.Health care management science · 2023Article
- Should everyone in need be treated equally? A European survey of expert judgment on social vulnerability to floods and pandemics to validate multi-hazard vulnerability factors.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023Article
- Ethical dilemmas experienced by nurses while caring for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review of qualitative studies.Journal of nursing management · 2022Review
- "Remember this picture when you take more than you need": Constructing morality through instrumental ageism in COVID-19 memes on social media.Journal of aging studies · 2022Article
- Older patients' perspectives on illness and healthcare during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.Nursing ethics · 2022Article
- Contributing factors for acute stress in healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Ecuador.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Preparing for Future Pandemics: Challenges for Healthcare Leadership.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2022Article
- Machine learning model for predicting the length of stay in the intensive care unit for Covid-19 patients in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2022Article
- Respiratory technologists in the frontlines against COVID-19.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Leadership in a time of crisis: Lessons learned from a pandemic.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021Review
- The impact of crisis and disasters risk management in COVID-19 times: Insights and lessons learned from Saudi Arabia.Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2021Article
- Transmission and evaporation of cough droplets in an elevator: Numerical simulations of some possible scenarios.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021Article
- Identifying and Prioritizing Ethical Challenges in Clinical Services of Patients With Confirmed COVID-19 in Iran's Hospitals.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- COVID-19 Pandemic- Ethical Challenges for Healthcare Workers Practicing in Resource-Limited Settings.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Killing someone directly is never morally right, but sometimes, choosing someone to save and leaving another to die is. The moral philosophy, law, and medical ethics have all wrestled with the problem of distinguishing between saving someone and leaving another to die. While this distinction might seem intuitively straightforward, it becomes far more complex when applied in treating patients of novel Coronavirus Disease pandemic (COVID-19). The World Health Organization reports more than eight million and half cases of infection and more than 450,000 deaths, 26% in USA. However, with the exponential rise in number of COVID-19 victims and the shortage of life-saving ventilators, the pandemic has imposed to health professionals an ethical medical triage decision-making based on the utilitarian theory to maximize total benefits and life expectancy. Moreover, the decision to put restrictions on treatment beneficence is not discretionary, but an indispensable response to the overwhelming impacts of COVID-19 pandemic. The main concern is not whether to underline priorities, but how to do so systematically and ethically, instead of building decisions on individualized institutional aspirations or health professionals' intuition. The serious glaring disequilibrium, in healthcare market, between supply and demand for scarce medical resources in several developed nations (including the USA, UK, France, Italy, Spain, etc.) imposes a fundamental question: which COVID-19 patient to save when facing scarce resources?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.