Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32837980›Full record

ReviewExtreme Mechanics Letters2020

Data-driven modeling of COVID-19-Lessons learned.

Ellen Kuhl

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Extreme Mechanics Letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Risk from Reopening International Travel During a Disease X Pandemic: A Case Study of SARS-CoV-2.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A two-phase fluid model for epidemic flow.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2023
    Article
  9. Epidemic dynamics in census-calibrated modular contact network.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Building Process-Oriented Data Science Solutions for Real-World Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Mathematical modeling of the outbreak of COVID-19.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Global and local mobility as a barometer for COVID-19 dynamics.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Effects of B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 on COVID-19 Dynamics: A Campus Reopening Study.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the outbreak dynamics of COVID-19 through the lens of mathematical models is an elusive but significant goal. Within only half a year, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in more than 19 million reported cases across 188 countries with more than 700,000 deaths worldwide. Unlike any other disease in history, COVID-19 has generated an unprecedented volume of data, well documented, continuously updated, and broadly available to the general public. Yet, the precise role of mathematical modeling in providing quantitative insight into the COVID-19 pandemic remains a topic of ongoing debate. Here we discuss the lessons learned from six month of modeling COVID-19. We highlight the early success of classical models for infectious diseases and show why these models fail to predict the current outbreak dynamics of COVID-19. We illustrate how data-driven modeling can integrate classical epidemiology modeling and machine learning to infer critical disease parameters-in real time-from reported case data to make informed predictions and guide political decision making. We critically discuss questions that these models can and cannot answer and showcase controversial decisions around the early outbreak dynamics, outbreak control, and exit strategies. We anticipate that this summary will stimulate discussion within the modeling community and help provide guidelines for robust mathematical models to understand and manage the COVID-19 pandemic. EML webinar speakers, videos, and overviews are updated at https://imechanica.org/node/24098.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceCOVID-19Data-driven modelingEpidemiologyExtreme diffusionExtreme growth

Identifiers

PMID32837980
PMCPMC7427559
OpenAlexW3048821551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.