Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32837921›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Proceedings2021

3D scanning of a carburetor body using COMET 3D scanner supported by COLIN 3D software: Issues and solutions.

Abid Haleem, Pawan Gupta, Shashi Bahl, Mohd Javaid, Lalit Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Proceedings, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abid HaleemDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Pawan GuptaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Shashi BahlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University Hoshiarpur Campus, Hoshiarpur 146001, India.
Mohd JavaidDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Lalit KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the industry uses 3D Scanners for reverse engineering, new product design, rapid manufacturing, multimedia, architecture, inspection, and quality control. The scanning process converts a real object into a digital format. This paper's essential purpose is to show the use of a 3D blue light Scanner/COMET 3D to redesign a carburetor body. The paper identifies different issues involved in the processes to help future users. COMET 3D does scanning of the carburetor body by which COLIN 3D software is used for measurements, editing, and analyzing of the acquired point clouds data. This paper also identifies the necessary steps to undertake 3D Scanning and part dimensioning for a carburetor body. It also discusses the error/problems that occurred during the process. The applications of non-contact blue light 3D Scanners are many as they can be innovatively used to redesign an existing part, architecture designing, and reducing production cycle time, biomedical and associated applications. This paper's contribution lies in achieving a step-by-step procedure of scanning any three-dimensional object as this helps in understanding the 3D scanning hardware and support software. It provides good knowledge of how to resolve the issues that can cause an error during the measurement of the surfaces and scan objects.

Indexed as

Colin3DCOMET 3D scannerPoint cloudsReverse engineeringTriangulation

Identifiers

PMID32837921
PMCPMC7409943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.