Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32837830›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in psychiatry2020

Engaging in Late-Life Mental Health Research: a Narrative Review of Challenges to Participation.

Jordyn Newmark, Marie Anne Gebara, Howard Aizenstein, Jordan F Karp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordyn NewmarkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara St, Bellefield Towers 726, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Marie Anne GebaraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara St, Bellefield Towers 726, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1711-3306
Howard AizensteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara St, Bellefield Towers 726, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
Jordan F KarpDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara St, Bellefield Towers 726, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.

Funding

CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN LATE-LIFE MOOD DISORDERST32MH019986 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOWARD J AIZENSTEIN, Carmen Andreescu · 1997 to 2026
$6.9M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review seeks to ascertain the challenges older patients face with participation in mental health clinical research studies and suggests creative strategies to minimize these obstacles. RECENT

findingsChallenges to older adults' engagement in mental health research include practical, institutional, and collaboration-related barriers applicable to all clinical trials as well as more personal, cultural, and age-related patient barriers specific to geriatric mental health research. Universal research challenges include (1) institutional barriers of lack of funding and researchers, inter-researcher conflict, and sampling bias; (2) collaboration-related barriers involving miscommunication and clinician concerns; and (3) practical patient barriers such as scheduling issues, financial constraints, and transportation difficulties. Challenges unique to geriatric mental health research include (1) personal barriers such as no perceived need for treatment, prior negative experience, and mistrust of mental health research; (2) cultural barriers involving stigma and lack of bilingual or culturally matched staff; and (3) chronic medical issues and concerns about capacity. SUMMARY: Proposed solutions to these barriers include increased programmatic focus on and funding of geriatric psychiatry research grants, meeting with clinical staff to clarify study protocols and eligibility criteria, and offering transportation for participants. To minimize stigma and mistrust of psychiatric research, studies should devise community outreach efforts, employ culturally competent bilingual staff, and provide patient and family education about the study and general information about promoting mental health.

Indexed as

BarriersMental health researchOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID32837830
PMCPMC7242610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.