Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32837809›Full record

ArticleHealth and technology2020

Clinical needs and technical requirements for ventilators for COVID-19 treatment critical patients: an evidence-based comparison for adult and pediatric age.

Martina Andellini, Simone De Santis, Federico Nocchi, Elena Bassanelli, Leandro Pecchia, Matteo Ritrovato

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina AndelliniHTA Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Viale di Villa Pamphili 100, 00152 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2931-0753
Simone De SantisHTA & Safety Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Federico NocchiClinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Elena BassanelliHTA & Safety Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Leandro PecchiaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK.
Matteo RitrovatoHTA Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Viale di Villa Pamphili 100, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, taking on pandemic proportions, is placing extraordinary and unprecedented demands on healthcare systems worldwide. The increasing number of critical patients who, experiencing respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome, need respiratory support, has been leading countries to race against time in arranging new Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and in finding affordable and practical solutions to manage patients in each stage of the disease. The simultaneous worldwide emergency caused serious problems for mechanical ventilators supply. This chaotic scenario generated, indeed, a frenetic race to buy life-saving ventilators. However, the variety of mechanical ventilators designs, together with the limitations in time and resources, make the decision-making processes on ventilators procurement crucial and not counterbalanced by the evaluation of devices quality. This paper aimed at offering an overview of how evidence-based approach for health technologies evaluation, might provide support during Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in ICUs management and critical equipment supply. We compared and combined all the publicly available indications on the essential requirements that ICU ventilators might meet to be considered acceptable for treating COVID-19 patients in severe to critical illnesses. We hope that the critical analysis of these data might help readers to understand how structured decision-making processes based on evidence, evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a given medical device and the effects of its introduction in a healthcare setting, are able to optimize time and resources allocation that should be considered essential, especially during pandemic period.

Indexed as

COVID-19EmergencyIntensive care ventilatorsMechanical ventilatorsPediatricVentilators’ essential technical requirements

Identifiers

PMID32837809
PMCPMC7392366
OpenAlexW3046051358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.