ArticlePlant diversity2020
Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity.
Article in Plant diversity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Citizen Sailors Provide a Detailed Map of Open-Ocean Surface Biodiversity and Help Link eDNA Data to Satellite Observations.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Intercropping Enhances Arthropod Diversity and Ecological Balance in Cowpea, Hemp, and Watermelon Systems.Insects · 2025Article
- In vitro micropropagation protocols for two endangered Dianthus species - via in vitro culture for conservation and recultivation purposes.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Article
- Ecological dynamics and microbial community composition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Viability of a Small Giant Panda Population Through Individual Introduction From a Larger Conspecific Group: A Scientific Simulation Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Assessing the Reproductive Ecology of a Rare Mint,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Native plant diversity for ecological reclamation in Moroccan open-pit phosphate mines.Biodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- Choosing the Right Path for the Successful Storage of Seeds.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Two new species from Sulawesi and Borneo facilitate phylogeny and taxonomic revision ofPlant diversity · 2022Article
- Cryopreservation of Endangered Ornamental Plants and Fruit Crops from Tropical and Subtropical Regions.Biology · 2022Review
- Can we tackle climate change by behavioral hacking of the dopaminergic system?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Review
- Fruiting character variability in wild individuals of Malania oleifera, a highly valued endemic species.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Extinction Risk Assessment of the Greek Endemic Flora.Biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Sharing earth with all life.Plant diversity · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Anthropocene is marked by twin crises: climate change and biodiversity loss. Climate change has tended to dominate the headlines, reflecting, in part, the greater complexity of the biodiversity crisis. Biodiversity itself is a difficult concept. Land plants dominate the global biomass and terrestrial arthropods probably dominate in terms of numbers of species, but most of the Tree of Life consists of single-celled eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea. Wild plants provide a huge variety of products and services to people, ranging from those that are species-specific, such as food, medicine, and genetic resources, to many which are partly interchangeable, such as timber and forage for domestic animals, and others which depend on the whole community, but not on individual species, such as regulation of water supply and carbon sequestration. The use of information from remote sensing has encouraged a simplified view of the values of nature's contributions to people, but this does not match the way most people value nature. We can currently estimate the proportion of species threatened by human impacts only for a few well-assessed groups, for which it ranges from 14% (birds) to 63% (cycads). Less than 8% of land plants have been assessed, but it has been estimated that 30-44% are threatened, although there are still few (0.2%) well-documented extinctions. Priorities for improving protection of biodiversity include: improving the inventory, with surveys focused on geographical areas and taxonomic groups which are under-collected; expanding the protected area system and its representativeness; controlling overexploitation; managing invasive species; conserving threatened species
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.