ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2020
Comparison of Telehealth-Related Ethics and Guidelines and a Checklist for Ethical Decision Making in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting Ethical Discussions and Decision Making in a Human Services Agency: Updates to LeBlanc et al.'s (2020) Ethics Network.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Mental Health Care Guidelines for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- We Have a Behavior Analyst Licensure Law. Can't We Relax Now?Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Telehealth competencies for allied health professionals: A scoping review.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2025Article
- Fundamentals of telehealth: A learning compendium for residents.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Telehealth Training and Education for Allied Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.Telemedicine reports · 2025Review
- Geographic Access to Registered Behavior Technicians among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Preliminary Practice Recommendations for Telehealth Direct Applied Behavior Analysis Services with Children with Autism.Journal of behavioral education · 2022Article
- Maintaining Effective Supervision Systems for Trainees Pursuing a Behavior Analyst Certification Board Certification During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavior analysis in practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Applied behavior analysis (ABA) services have been provided primarily in the fields of health care and education across various settings using an in-person service delivery model. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the necessity of and demand for ABA services using telehealth have increased. The purpose of the present article was to cross-examine the ethical codes and guidelines of different, but related fields of practice and to discuss potential implications for telehealth-based ABA service delivery. We reviewed the telehealth-specific ethical codes and guidelines of the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the National Association of Social Workers, along with the related ABA literature. These organizations addressed several useful and unique ethical concerns that have not been addressed in ABA literature. We also developed a brief checklist for ABA practitioners to evaluate their telehealth readiness by meeting the legal, professional, and ethical requirements of ABA services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.