Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32837191›Full record

ArticleDrugs & therapy perspectives : for rational drug selection and use2020

Knowledge and beliefs towards universal safety precautions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic among the Indian public: a web-based cross-sectional survey.

Sai Krishna Gudi, Manik Chhabra, Krishna Undela, Rajesh Venkataraman, Uday Venkat Mateti, Komal Krishna Tiwari, Sanath Nyamagoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & therapy perspectives : for rational drug selection and use, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of Risk Perception on Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sai Krishna GudiCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 228 Notre Dame Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3B 1N7 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-9207
Manik ChhabraDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Indo-Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab India.ORCID 0000-0002-8924-8242
Krishna UndelaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education AND Research, Mysore, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-7480-8761
Rajesh VenkataramanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Adichunchanagiri College of Pharmacy, Adichunchanagiri University, B.G. Nagara, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-6218-9617
Uday Venkat MatetiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-2067
Komal Krishna TiwariJSS College of Physiotherapy, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Mysore, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-7092-1601
Sanath NyamagoudDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, KLE University, Hubli, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-5111-7685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is considered the most serious global health threat in recent times. As there is a current lack of approved treatments and vaccines, universal safety precautions (USPs) must be taken to deal with this emergency. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and beliefs of the Indian public with regard to USPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted during March 2020. A 20-item self-administered questionnaire was developed, validated and distributed using Google Forms through social media networks. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors influencing knowledge regarding COVID-19 USPs. Results: Of the 1117 individuals who participated in the survey, the mean age was 28.8 ± 10.9 years, 32.9% had a post-graduate education, 45% had a professional job, and 40% belonged to the upper-middle economic class. Overall, the mean correct response scores were 63% for USP knowledge and 83% for USP beliefs. All the sociodemographic variables were significantly ( Conclusion: Although the knowledge and beliefs of the Indian public towards USPs are encouraging, there is a need for long-term educational interventions as the dynamics and severity of COVID-19 rapidly change. These findings could guide public health authorities to make and implement precautionary measures to combat this pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID32837191
PMCPMC7334629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.