Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32836842›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental & resource economics2020

Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation.

David Klenert, Franziska Funke, Linus Mattauch, Brian O'Callaghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental & resource economics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Interactions between climate and COVID-19.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Global health and ecology: A critical view from Latin America. Magazine of the Ecuadorian Association of Catholic Alumni in Germany.AEBCAMagazin : revista de la Asociacion Ecuatoriana de Exbecarios catolicos en Alemania · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David KlenertJoint Research Centre, European Commission, Calle Inca Garcilaso, 3, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-0938
Franziska FunkeInstitute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Linus MattauchInstitute for New Economic Thinking, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brian O'CallaghanSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nexus of COVID-19 and climate change has so far brought attention to short-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions, public health responses, and clean recovery stimulus packages. We take a more holistic approach, making five broad comparisons between the crises with five associated lessons for climate change mitigation policy. First, delay is costly. Second, policy design must overcome biases to human judgment. Third, inequality can be exacerbated without timely action. Fourth, global problems require multiple forms of international cooperation. Fifth, transparency of normative positions is needed to navigate value judgments at the science-policy interface. Learning from policy challenges during the COVID-19 crisis could enhance efforts to reduce GHG emissions and prepare humanity for future crises.

Indexed as

Climate changeClimate policyCOVID-19Global cooperationInequalityPsychological biasPublic supportRole of scientists

Identifiers

PMID32836842
PMCPMC7397958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.