Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32836594›Full record

ArticlePolymer bulletin (Berlin, Germany)2021

A facile approach for the preparation of polycarbonate nanofiber mat with filtration capability.

Thomas Baby, Tomlal E Jose, C T Aravindkumar, John Richard Thomas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymer bulletin (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas BabyKuriakose Gregorios College Pampady, Kottayam, Kerala 686502 India.
Tomlal E JoseSt Berchmans College, Changanachery, Kottayam, Kerala 686101 India.ORCID 0000-0001-5991-610X
C T AravindkumarSchool of Environmental Sciences, Mahatma University, Kottayam, Kerala 686101 India.
John Richard ThomasSchool of Environmental Sciences, Mahatma University, Kottayam, Kerala 686101 India.
Government Medical College · INMahatma Gandhi University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present day environmental issues demand a lot from scientists and engineers to keep the planet earth safe for its habitats. There were lot of attempts for developing efficient air and liquid filters as the demand increases with an utmost concern of present environmental situations. Thanks to its large surface area to volume ratio, polymer nanofibers and composites are found to be good substitute for conventional filters. As per the research and analysis data, filtration efficiency increases proportional to the reduction of the average diameter of the fibers. In this study, the most efficient electrospinning technology was adopted to prepare polycarbonate (PC) nanofiber mat which yields a very fine surface morphology. There are earlier researches and associated data available about the preparation of PC nanofibers but with average fiber diameter above 1000 nm. In this study, a systematic methodology was instigated to generate PC nanofibers with least average diameter of 90 nm without using any surfactants or salts. The most suitable solvents, solvent proportion, polymer concentration and electrospinning conditions for the formation of the fiber mat are discussed elaborately. PC fiber mat of least average diameter was proved to be highly efficient for particulate matter adsorption using a dust sampling analyzer.

Indexed as

Beaded fiberElectrospinningFiber matParticulate matterTaylor cone

Identifiers

PMID32836594
PMCPMC7307946
OpenAlexW3036392444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.