Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32836587›Full record

ReviewBiogeochemistry2020

From hogs to HABs: impacts of industrial farming in the US on nitrogen and phosphorus and greenhouse gas pollution.

Patricia M Glibert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biogeochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Valuing improvements in the ecological integrity of local and regional waters using the biological condition gradient.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phosphorus Inventory for the Conterminous United States (2002-2012).Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patricia M GlibertHorn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, PO Box 775, Cambridge, MD 21613 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5690-1674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient pollution and greenhouse gas emissions related to crop agriculture and confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in the US have changed substantially in recent years, in amounts and forms. This review is intended to provide a broad view of how nutrient inputs-from fertilizer and CAFOs-as well as atmospheric NH

Indexed as

Algal bloomsAtmospheric depositionCAFOsEutrophicationFactory farmsGreenhouse gassesManureN and P fertilizer

Identifiers

PMID32836587
PMCPMC7416595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.