Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32835821›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.

Joshua P Kulasingham, Christian Brodbeck, Alessandro Presacco, Stefanie E Kuchinsky, Samira Anderson, Jonathan Z Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Very Early Cortical Auditory Responses to Speech in Humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Attentional Modulation of the Cortical Contribution to the Frequency-Following Response Evoked by Continuous Speech.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua P Kulasingham(a)Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States. Electronic address: joshuapk@umd.edu.
Christian Brodbeck(b)Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: christianbrodbeck@me.com.
Alessandro Presacco(b)Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: apresacc@umd.edu.
Stefanie E Kuchinsky(c)Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: skuchins@umd.edu.
Samira Anderson(d)Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: sander22@umd.edu.
Jonathan Z Simon(a)Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States; (b)Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States; (e)Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: jzsimon@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Speech Perception with High Cognitive DemandP01AG055365 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GORDON-SALANT, SANDRA M · 2017 to 2021
$8.4M
COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Auditory Scene Analysis and Temporal Cortical ComputationsR01DC014085 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SIMON, JONATHAN Z. · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG055365NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014085NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural processing along the ascending auditory pathway is often associated with a progressive reduction in characteristic processing rates. For instance, the well-known frequency-following response (FFR) of the auditory midbrain, as measured with electroencephalography (EEG), is dominated by frequencies from ∼100 Hz to several hundred Hz, phase-locking to the acoustic stimulus at those frequencies. In contrast, cortical responses, whether measured by EEG or magnetoencephalography (MEG), are typically characterized by frequencies of a few Hz to a few tens of Hz, time-locking to acoustic envelope features. In this study we investigated a crossover case, cortically generated responses time-locked to continuous speech features at FFR-like rates. Using MEG, we analyzed responses in the high gamma range of 70-200 Hz to continuous speech using neural source-localized reverse correlation and the corresponding temporal response functions (TRFs). Continuous speech stimuli were presented to 40 subjects (17 younger, 23 older adults) with clinically normal hearing and their MEG responses were analyzed in the 70-200 Hz band. Consistent with the relative insensitivity of MEG to many subcortical structures, the spatiotemporal profile of these response components indicated a cortical origin with ∼40 ms peak latency and a right hemisphere bias. TRF analysis was performed using two separate aspects of the speech stimuli: a) the 70-200 Hz carrier of the speech, and b) the 70-200 Hz temporal modulations in the spectral envelope of the speech stimulus. The response was dominantly driven by the envelope modulation, with a much weaker contribution from the carrier. Age-related differences were also analyzed to investigate a reversal previously seen along the ascending auditory pathway, whereby older listeners show weaker midbrain FFR responses than younger listeners, but, paradoxically, have stronger cortical low frequency responses. In contrast to both these earlier results, this study did not find clear age-related differences in high gamma cortical responses to continuous speech. Cortical responses at FFR-like frequencies shared some properties with midbrain responses at the same frequencies and with cortical responses at much lower frequencies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAgingAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedSpeechSpeech PerceptionAging, speech encodingAuditory spectrogramSpectrotemporalVolume source localization

Identifiers

PMID32835821
PMCPMC7736126
OpenAlexW3081494382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.