Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32835732›Full record

ArticleKidney international2021

Development and evaluation of deep learning-based segmentation of histologic structures in the kidney cortex with multiple histologic stains.

Catherine P Jayapandian, Yijiang Chen, Andrew R Janowczyk, Matthew B Palmer, Clarissa A Cassol, Miroslav Sekulic, Jeffrey B Hodgin, Jarcy Zee, Stephen M Hewitt, John O'Toole and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine P JayapandianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: cpj3@case.edu.
Yijiang ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Andrew R JanowczykDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Vaud, Switzerland.
Matthew B PalmerDepartment of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clarissa A CassolDepartment of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Miroslav SekulicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jeffrey B HodginDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jarcy ZeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stephen M HewittLaboratory of Pathology, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
John O'TooleLerner Research and Glickman Urology and Kidney Institutes, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Paula ToroDepartment of Pathology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
John R SedorLerner Research and Glickman Urology and Kidney Institutes, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Laura BarisoniDepartment of Pathology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE)
Case Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USDuke University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

Experimental Pathology Laboratory (EPL)ZICBC011638 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HEWITT, STEPHEN · 2015 to 2025
$16.6M
Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
CWRU NEPHROLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007470 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SEDOR, JOHN R. · 1986 to 2019
$2.9M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
RadxTools for assessing tumor treatment response on imagingU01CA248226 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI TIWARI, PALLAVI, VISWANATH, SATISH EASWAR · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
A Study to Validate and Improve an Automated Image Analysis Algorithm to Detect Tuberculosis in Sputum Smear SlidesR43EB028736 · NIBIB · DIASCOPIC, LLC · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, SERIF, CARY · 2019 to 2019
$225k
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
RadIO: A Novel Radiomics Toolkit to Predict and Characterize Response to Immunotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung CancerI01BX004121 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI Anant Madabhushi, Charles J Nock · 2019 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004121BLRD VA IK6 BX006185NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248226NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB028736NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep learning for automated segmentation (delineation of boundaries) of histologic primitives (structures) from whole slide images can facilitate the establishment of novel protocols for kidney biopsy assessment. Here, we developed and validated deep learning networks for the segmentation of histologic structures on kidney biopsies and nephrectomies. For development, we examined 125 biopsies for Minimal Change Disease collected across 29 NEPTUNE enrolling centers along with 459 whole slide images stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (125), Periodic Acid Schiff (125), Silver (102), and Trichrome (107) divided into training, validation and testing sets (ratio 6:1:3). Histologic structures were manually segmented (30048 total annotations) by five nephropathologists. Twenty deep learning models were trained with optimal digital magnification across the structures and stains. Periodic Acid Schiff-stained whole slide images yielded the best concordance between pathologists and deep learning segmentation across all structures (F-scores: 0.93 for glomerular tufts, 0.94 for glomerular tuft plus Bowman's capsule, 0.91 for proximal tubules, 0.93 for distal tubular segments, 0.81 for peritubular capillaries, and 0.85 for arteries and afferent arterioles). Optimal digital magnifications were 5X for glomerular tuft/tuft plus Bowman's capsule, 10X for proximal/distal tubule, arteries and afferent arterioles, and 40X for peritubular capillaries. Silver stained whole slide images yielded the worst deep learning performance. Thus, this largest study to date adapted deep learning for the segmentation of kidney histologic structures across multiple stains and pathology laboratories. All data used for training and testing and a detailed online tutorial will be publicly available.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBiopsyColoring AgentsKidneyKidney CortexColoring Agentscomputerized morphologic assessmentdeep learningdigital pathologykidney histologic primitiveslarge-scale tissue interrogationrenal biopsy interpretation

Identifiers

PMID32835732
PMCPMC8414393
OpenAlexW3080677331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.