Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32835586›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2020

Analysis of selective target engagement by small-molecule sphingosine kinase inhibitors using the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (CETSA).

Jeremy A Hengst, Taryn E Dick, Charles D Smith, Jong K Yun

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy A HengstDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4850-1464
Taryn E DickDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-3433
Charles D SmithDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7185-5928
Jong K YunDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine , Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-7795
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

Tissue Repository and Animal Models CoreP01CA171983 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CHALFANT, CHARLES E. · 2013 to 2024
$19.9M
Project 3: Targeting SK2/S1P Signaling for the Regulation of c-Myc and Tumor SuppressionP01CA203628 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI OGRETMEN, BESIM · 2016 to 2021
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA171983NCI NIH HHS P01 CA203628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently renewed interest in scientific rigor and reproducibility is of critical importance for both scientists developing new targeted small-molecule inhibitors and those employing these molecule in cellular studies, alike. While off-target effects are commonly considered as limitations for any given small-molecule inhibitor, the ability of a given compound to distinguish between enzyme isoforms is often neglected when employing compounds in cellular studies. To call attention to this issue, we have compared the results of an assay for "direct target engagement", the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (CETSA), to the published isoform selectivity of 12 commercially available sphingosine kinase 1 and 2 (SphK 1 and SphK2) inhibitors. Our results suggest that, at the concentrations commonly employed in cellular assay systems, none of the tested SKIs can be considered isoform selective. Thus, caution and complimentary assay strategies must be employed to fully discern isoform selectivity for the SphKs. Moreover, caution must be employed by the scientific community as a whole when designing experiments that aim to discern the effects of one enzyme isoform versus another to ensure that the concentration ranges used are able to distinguish isoform selectivity.

Indexed as

Biological AssayDrug DiscoveryHumansPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)Sphingosine KinasePhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)Sphingosine KinaseCETSAisoform selectivitysphingolipidsSphingosine kinasetarget engagement

Identifiers

PMID32835586
PMCPMC7515464
OpenAlexW3080289536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.