Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32835157›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in environmental science & health2020

Wastewater and public health: the potential of wastewater surveillance for monitoring COVID-19.

Kata Farkas, Luke S Hillary, Shelagh K Malham, James E McDonald, David L Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in environmental science & health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kata FarkasSchool of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, UK.
Luke S HillarySchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
Shelagh K MalhamSchool of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, UK.
James E McDonaldSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
David L JonesSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic viruses represent one of the greatest threats to human well-being. As evidenced by the COVID-19 global pandemic, however, halting the spread of highly contagious diseases is notoriously difficult. Successful control strategies therefore have to rely on effective surveillance. Here, we describe how monitoring wastewater from urban areas can be used to detect the arrival and subsequent decline of pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2. As the amount of virus shed in faeces and urine varies largely from person to person, it is very difficult to quantitatively determine the number of people who are infected in the population. More research on the surveillance of viruses in wastewater using accurate and validated methods, as well as subsequent risk analysis and modelling is paramount in understanding the dynamics of viral outbreaks.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Public healthRisk assessmentSARS-CoV-2Virus surveillanceWastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID32835157
PMCPMC7291992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.