ArticleMeta gene2020
Methods for making multiple alignment of genomic sequences for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Article in Meta gene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in December 2019 and caused a pandemic. To monitor the global transmission pattern of SARS-CoV-2, it is required to constantly update the phylogenetic tree of genomic sequences with 29.9 kb, which may be time consuming. Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 may be accelerated by making a multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences using the CPA (combining pairwise alignments) method, in which a pairwise alignment is made for a reference and each of other sequences, and the pairwise alignments are combined into a multiple alignment. Here it is shown from the analysis of 3729 genomic sequences for SARS-CoV-2 and outgroup strains that the CPA method can produce a multiple alignment with an elevated or a reduced number of variable sites depending on the reference compared to the OMA (ordinary multiple alignment) method, which was considered to be the most reliable. In particular, the topology of the phylogenetic tree constructed from the multiple alignment made using the CPA method adopting the outgroup sequence as the reference was considerably different from that using the OMA method, suggesting that the outgroup sequence may not be suitable as the reference in the CPA method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.