Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32834952›Full record

ArticleGlobal food security2020

A research vision for food systems in the 2020s: Defying the status quo.

Jessica Fanzo, Namukolo Covic, Achim Dobermann, Spencer Henson, Mario Herrero, Prabhu Pingali, Steve Staal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global food security, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic resources, opportunities, and prospects for accelerated improvement of millets.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  7. Isolation of aFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Considering Ecosystem Services in Food System Resilience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica FanzoBerman Institute of Bioethics, Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and Bloomberg School of Public Health Johns Hopkins University 1717 Massachusetts Ave NW 730 Washington DC 20036 USA.
Namukolo CovicInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Poverty, Health and Nutrition Division, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Achim DobermannInternational Fertilizer Association, Paris, France.
Spencer HensonUniversity of Guelph Department of Food Agricultural and Resource Economics, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Mario HerreroCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Prabhu PingaliCornell University Charles H Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Ithaca, New York, United States.
Steve StaalKuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•Research and science should not only inform food and environmental policy but should be adopted and mainstreamed into actions at all levels.•Food systems are faced with grander and interconnected challenges and constraints that bring about new research questions.•Research has a vital role in charting a positive and sustainable direction for global food security, nutrition, and health.•The status quo must be challenged to shape food systems transformation to deliver sustainable, healthier diets.•

Indexed as

Food securityFood systemsFuture studiesMalnutritionResearch and development

Identifiers

PMID32834952
PMCPMC7366074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.