Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32834662›Full record

ArticleChaos, solitons, and fractals2020

Forecasting the patterns of COVID-19 and causal impacts of lockdown in top five affected countries using Bayesian Structural Time Series Models.

Navid Feroze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos, solitons, and fractals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Navid FerozeDepartment of Statistics, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzffarabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are numerous studies dealing with analysis for the future patterns of COVID-19 in different countries using conventional time series models. This study aims to provide more flexible analytical framework that decomposes the important components of the time series, incorporates the prior information, and captures the evolving nature of model parameters.

methodsWe have employed the Bayesian structural time series (BSTS) models to investigate the temporal dynamics of COVID-19 in top five affected countries around the world in the time window March 1, 2020 to June 29, 2020. In addition, we have analyzed the casual impact of lockdown in these countries using intervention analysis under BSTS models.

resultsWe achieved better levels of accuracy as compared to ARIMA models. The forecasts for the next 30 days suggest that India, Brazil, USA, Russia and UK are expected to have 101.42%, 85.85%, 46.73%, 32.50% and 15.17% increase in number of confirmed cases, respectively. On the other hand, there is a chance of 70.32%, 52.54%, 45.65%, 19.29% and 18.23% growth in the death figures for India, Brazil, Russia, USA and UK, respectively. In addition, USA and UK have made quite sagacious choices for lifting/relaxing the lockdowns. However, the pace of outbreak has significantly increased in Brazil, India and Russia after easing the lockdowns.

conclusionOn the whole, the Indian and Brazilian healthcare system is likely to be seriously overburdened in the next month. Though USA and Russia have managed to cut down the rates of positive cases, but serious efforts will be required to keep these momentums on. On the other hand, UK has been successful in flattening their outbreak trajectories.

Indexed as

Intervention analysisPosterior probabilitiesPrediction intervals and forecast accuracy measures

Identifiers

PMID32834662
PMCPMC7420989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.