Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32834561›Full record

ArticleProcess safety and environmental protection : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B2020

Biodegradable CA/CPB electrospun nanofibers for efficient retention of airborne nanoparticles.

Daniela Sanches de Almeida, Leila Droprinchinski Martins, Edvani Curti Muniz, Anderson Paulo Rudke, Rafaela Squizzato, Alexandra Beal, Paulo Ricardo de Souza, Daniela Patrícia Freire Bonfim, Mônica Lopes Aguiar, Marcelino Luiz Gimenes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Process safety and environmental protection : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanotechnology and COVID-19:Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela Sanches de AlmeidaState University of Maringá, Av. Colombo, 5790 - Vila Esperança, Maringá, PR, 87020-900, Brazil.
Leila Droprinchinski MartinsFederal University of Technology - Paraná, Av. Dos Pioneiros, 3131, Londrina, PR, 86036-370, Brazil.
Edvani Curti MunizState University of Maringá, Av. Colombo, 5790 - Vila Esperança, Maringá, PR, 87020-900, Brazil.
Anderson Paulo RudkeFederal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.
Rafaela SquizzatoUniversity of São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 1226 - Cidade Universitária, 05508-090, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandra BealState University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Pr 445, Km 380, 86057-970, Londrina, Brazil.
Paulo Ricardo de SouzaState University of Maringá, Av. Colombo, 5790 - Vila Esperança, Maringá, PR, 87020-900, Brazil.
Daniela Patrícia Freire BonfimFederal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luiz, Km 235, SP310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Mônica Lopes AguiarFederal University of São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luiz, Km 235, SP310, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Marcelino Luiz GimenesState University of Maringá, Av. Colombo, 5790 - Vila Esperança, Maringá, PR, 87020-900, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase of the industrialization process brought the growth of pollutant emissions into the atmosphere. At the same time, the demand for advances in aerosol filtration is evolving towards more sustainable technologies. Electrospinning is gaining notoriety, once it enables to produce polymeric nanofibers with different additives and also the obtaining of small pore sizes and fiber diameters; desirable features for air filtration materials. Therefore, this work aims to evaluate the filtration performance of cellulose acetate (CA) nanofibers and cationic surfactant cetylpyridinium bromide (CPB) produced by electrospinning technique for retention of aerosol nanoparticles. The pressure drop and collection efficiency measurements of sodium chloride (NaCl) aerosol particles (diameters from 7 to 300 nm) were performed using Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS). The average diameter of the electrospun nanofibers used was 239 nm, ranging from 113 to 398 nm. Experimental results indicated that the nanofibers showed good permeability (10

Indexed as

Air pollutionIndoor air filtrationNano-and microparticles retentionNanofiber

Identifiers

PMID32834561
PMCPMC7366959
OpenAlexW3043646215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.