Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32834514›Full record

ArticleSafety science2020

Reflecting on the safety zoo: Developing an integrated pandemics barrier model using early lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic.

Paul Lindhout, Genserik Reniers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Communicating COVID-19 risk changes: Signalling with words, phrases, and messages.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of bow tie analysis and inherently safer design to the novel coronavirus hazard.Process safety and environmental protection : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B · 2021
    Article
  5. Pandemic risk management using engineering safety principles.Process safety and environmental protection : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul LindhoutDelft University of Technology, TPM Safety & Security Science Group (S3G), the Netherlands.
Genserik ReniersDelft University of Technology, TPM Safety & Security Science Group (S3G), the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our current predicament, the Covid-19 pandemic is first of all a health crisis. However, social disruption and economic damage are becoming visible some 7 months after the Wuhan City outbreak early December 2019. The authors wondered what could have been done better in prevention and repression of the Covid-19 pandemic from a safety management and risk control point of view. Within a case study framework, the authors gathered literature on pandemics, about country response effectiveness, and about human behaviour in the face of danger. The results consist of a safety management oriented narrative about the current pandemic, several critical observations about the current paradigms and shortcomings of preparation, and a number of opportunities for improvements of countermeasures. Many of the proverbial animals in the

Indexed as

BowtieIntegrated pandemics barrier modelLessons learnedPandemicParadigmSafety managementSafety zooScenario

Identifiers

PMID32834514
PMCPMC7351432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.