ArticleJournal of aerosol science2020
Fundamental protective mechanisms of face masks against droplet infections.
Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors Associated with the Implementation of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Reducing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Postpandemic masking practices among health care personnel: beliefs, barriers, and opportunities for improving adherence in clinical settings.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- DATIV-Remote Enhancement of Smart Aerosol Measurement System Using Raspberry Pi-Based Distributed Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Measuring the effects of respiratory protective equipment and other protectors in preventing the scattering of vocalization droplets.Industrial health · 2023Article
- Article
- Predictors and motives for mask-wearing behavior and vaccination intention.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Comparison of the Effect of Facemasks on Perceived Breathability and Air Quality during Daily Activities and Indoor Exercises.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- A computational framework for transmission risk assessment of aerosolized particles in classrooms.Engineering with computers · 2023Article
- Measured Air Flow Leakage in Facemask Usage.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Fate of Exhaled Droplets From Breathing and Coughing in Supermarket Checkouts and Passenger Cars.Environmental health insights · 2023Article
- Quantitative evaluation of precautions against the COVID-19 indoor transmission through human coughing.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Individual and household risk factors for COVID-19 infection among household members of COVID-19 patients in home-based care in western Uganda, 2020.IJID regions · 2022Article
- A critical review on the role of leakages in the facemask protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection with consideration of vaccination and virus variants.Indoor air · 2022Review
- Impact of washing parameters on bacterial filtration efficiency and breathability of community and medical facemasks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effects of surgical masks on aerosol dispersion in professional singing.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2022Article
- Changes in the use of cosmetics worldwide due to increased use of masks in the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Review
- TU Delft COVID-app: A tool to democratize CFD simulations for SARS-CoV-2 infection risk analysis.The Science of the total environment · 2022Article
- Aerosol particle emission increases exponentially above moderate exercise intensity resulting in superemission during maximal exercise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Do They Really Work? Quantifying Fabric Mask Effectiveness to Improve Public Health Messaging.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Challenges for the practice of evidence-based medicine during COVID-19 pandemic (practice of evidence-based medicine in the new normal).Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many governments have instructed the population to wear simple mouse-and-nose covers or surgical face masks to protect themselves from droplet infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in public. However, the basic protection mechanisms and benefits of these masks remain controversial. Therefore, the aim of this work is to show from a fluid physics point of view under which circumstances these masks can protect against droplet infection. First of all, we show that the masks protect people in the surrounding area quite well, since the flow resistance of the face masks effectively prevents the spread of exhaled air, e.g. when breathing, speaking, singing, coughing and sneezing. Secondly, we provide visual evidence that typical household materials used by the population to make masks do not provide highly efficient protection against respirable particles and droplets with a diameter of 0.3-2 μm as they pass through the materials largely unfiltered. According to our tests, only vacuum cleaner bags with fine dust filters show a comparable or even better filtering effect than commercial particle filtering FFP2/N95/KN95 half masks. Thirdly, we show that even simple mouse-and-nose covers made of good filter material cannot reliably protect against droplet infection in contaminated ambient air, since most of the air flows through gaps at the edge of the masks. Only a close-fitting, particle-filtering respirator offers good self-protection against droplet infection. Nevertheless, wearing simple homemade or surgical face masks in public is highly recommended if no particle filtrating respiratory mask is available. Firstly, because they protect against habitual contact of the face with the hands and thus serve as self-protection against contact infection. Secondly, because the flow resistance of the masks ensures that the air remains close to the head when breathing, speaking, singing, coughing and sneezing, thus protecting other people if they have sufficient distance from each other. However, if the distance rules cannot be observed and the risk of inhalation-based infection becomes high because many people in the vicinity are infectious and the air exchange rate is small, improved filtration efficiency masks are needed, to take full advantage of the three fundamental protective mechanisms these masks provide.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.