Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32834019›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Asia-wide phylogeography of wild boar (Sus scrofa) based on mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome: Revising the migration routes of wild boar in Asia.

Sung Kyoung Choi, Kyung Seok Kim, Maryana Ranyuk, Elmar Babaev, Inna Voloshina, Damdingiin Bayarlkhagva, Jong-Ryol Chong, Naotaka Ishiguro, Li Yu, Mi-Sook Min and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phylogenetic Relations and High-Altitude Adaptation in Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic Diversity of Wild Boar and Deer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sung Kyoung ChoiConservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Seok KimConservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Maryana RanyukInstitute of Plant and Animal Ecology Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation.
Elmar BabaevCaspian Institute of biological Resources of Dagestan Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Makhachkala, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-2250-5267
Inna VoloshinaLazovsky State Nature Reserve, Lazo, Primorsky Krai, Russian Federation.
Damdingiin BayarlkhagvaDepartment of the Biology, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.ORCID 0000-0002-1896-5172
Jong-Ryol ChongWildlife Research Centre, Korea University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naotaka IshiguroLaboratory of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Li YuLaboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource and Key Laboratory for Microbial Resources of the Ministry of Education, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Mi-Sook MinConservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hang LeeConservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nickolay MarkovInstitute of Plant and Animal Ecology Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-4400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetics of pigs has been well studied in Europe and Asia, but most of previous studies of molecular phylogeny of Sus scrofa have been based on sequences of both wild and domestic forms. In this study we analysed genetic traits of Sus scrofa from 13 regions in Asia (including previously undisclosed Eastern Caucasus and Trans-Baikal regions) using purely wild boar samples. Mitochondrial control region and Y-chromosome genes (AMELY & USP9Y) were employed to resolve phylogeographic relationships. We discussed spatio-temporal dynamics of wild boar distribution and compared molecular data to morphological and cytogenetic data on wild boar variability and taxonomy. A total of 51 haplotypes were detected in mtDNA control region and five haplotypes were found in combined sequences of Y-chromosome genes. The phylogeography of Asia-wide wild boars supported a hypothesis of migration from South-East Asia to South Asia, followed by migration to East and West Asia. We present a hypothesis about independent dispersal of wild boars into West Asia from South and North-East Asia. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny generally fits the morphologically based intraspecies taxonomy. Distribution of chromosomal variants of wild boar presently does not show clear correlation with mtDNA clades.

Indexed as

PhylogeographyAnimalsAsiaDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationSus scrofaY ChromosomeDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID32834019
PMCPMC7444817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.