ArticlePloS one2020
Predictive analysis methods for human microbiome data with application to Parkinson's disease.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global Microbiome: Core and Unique Signatures Across Diverse Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- HighDimMixedModels.jl: Robust high-dimensional mixed-effects models across omics data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Composite quantile regression approach to batch effect correction in microbiome data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The Paraguayan gut microbiome contains high abundance of the phylum Actinobacteriota and reveals the influence of health and lifestyle factors.Gut microbes reports · 2024Article
- Gut microbiome and nutrition-related predictors of response to immunotherapy in cancer: making sense of the puzzle.BJC reports · 2023Review
- NEMoE: a nutrition aware regularized mixture of experts model to identify heterogeneous diet-microbiome-host health interactions.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Compositionality, sparsity, spurious heterogeneity, and other data-driven challenges for machine learning algorithms within plant microbiome studies.Current opinion in plant biology · 2023Review
- Gut dysbiosis and age-related neurological diseases in females.Neurobiology of disease · 2022Review
- Integrated Microbiome and Host Transcriptome Profiles Link Parkinson's Disease toFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- TrpNet: Understanding Tryptophan Metabolism across Gut Microbiome.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Randomized quantile residuals for diagnosing zero-inflated generalized linear mixed models with applications to microbiome count data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- The ultra-structural, metabolomic and metagenomic characterisation of the sudanese smokeless tobacco 'Toombak'.Toxicology reports · 2021Article
- Can the Salivary Microbiome Predict Cardiovascular Diseases? Lessons Learned From the Qatari Population.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome data consists of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) counts characterized by zero-inflation, over-dispersion, and grouping structure among samples. Currently, statistical testing methods are commonly performed to identify OTUs that are associated with a phenotype. The limitations of statistical testing methods include that the validity of p-values/q-values depend sensitively on the correctness of models and that the statistical significance does not necessarily imply predictivity. Predictive analysis using methods such as LASSO is an alternative approach for identifying associated OTUs and for measuring the predictability of the phenotype variable with OTUs and other covariate variables. We investigate three strategies of performing predictive analysis: (1) LASSO: fitting a LASSO multinomial logistic regression model to all OTU counts with specific transformation; (2) screening+GLM: screening OTUs with q-values returned by fitting a GLMM to each OTU, then fitting a GLM model using a subset of selected OTUs; (3) screening+LASSO: fitting a LASSO to a subset of OTUs selected with GLMM. We have conducted empirical studies using three simulation datasets generated using Dirichlet-multinomial models and a real gut microbiome data related to Parkinson's disease to investigate the performance of the three strategies for predictive analysis. Our simulation studies show that the predictive performance of LASSO with appropriate variable transformation works remarkably well on zero-inflated data. Our results of real data analysis show that Parkinson's disease can be predicted based on selected OTUs after the binary transformation, age, and sex with high accuracy (Error Rate = 0.199, AUC = 0.872, AUPRC = 0.912). These results provide strong evidences of the relationship between Parkinson's disease and the gut microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.