Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833968›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

A novel single-cell based method for breast cancer prognosis.

Xiaomei Li, Lin Liu, Gregory J Goodall, Andreas Schreiber, Taosheng Xu, Jiuyong Li, Thuc D Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Weibull mixture cure frailty model for high-dimensional covariates.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaomei LiUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8870-3186
Lin LiuUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia.
Gregory J GoodallCentre for Cancer Biology, an alliance of SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-0692
Andreas SchreiberCentre for Cancer Biology, an alliance of SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Taosheng XuInstitute of Intelligent Machines, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8283-7274
Jiuyong LiUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9023-1878
Thuc D LeUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9732-4313

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer prognosis is challenging due to the heterogeneity of the disease. Various computational methods using bulk RNA-seq data have been proposed for breast cancer prognosis. However, these methods suffer from limited performances or ambiguous biological relevance, as a result of the neglect of intra-tumor heterogeneity. Recently, single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged for studying tumor heterogeneity at cellular levels. In this paper, we propose a novel method, scPrognosis, to improve breast cancer prognosis with scRNA-seq data. scPrognosis uses the scRNA-seq data of the biological process Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT). It firstly infers the EMT pseudotime and a dynamic gene co-expression network, then uses an integrative model to select genes important in EMT based on their expression variation and differentiation in different stages of EMT, and their roles in the dynamic gene co-expression network. To validate and apply the selected signatures to breast cancer prognosis, we use them as the features to build a prediction model with bulk RNA-seq data. The experimental results show that scPrognosis outperforms other benchmark breast cancer prognosis methods that use bulk RNA-seq data. Moreover, the dynamic changes in the expression of the selected signature genes in EMT may provide clues to the link between EMT and clinical outcomes of breast cancer. scPrognosis will also be useful when applied to scRNA-seq datasets of different biological processes other than EMT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleGene ExpressionHumansPrognosisSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32833968
PMCPMC7470419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.