Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833618›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2020

The effect of peritoneal re-approximation on lymphocele formation in transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Mehmet Salih Boğa, Mehmet Giray Sönmez, Kaan Karamık, Kayhan Yılmaz, Murat Savaş, Mutlu Ateş

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet Salih BoğaDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-8075
Mehmet Giray SönmezDepartment of Urology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-7348
Kaan KaramıkDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-5313
Kayhan YılmazDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3592-4572
Murat SavaşDepartment of Urology, Private Memorial Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-4699
Mutlu AteşDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3951-4271
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAntalya IVF · TRNecmettin Erbakan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of peritoneal re-approximation at the end of the procedure in transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (tRARP) and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND) on operative, oncologic, and symptomatic lymphocele rates. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 79 patients were included in the study who underwent tRARP and bilateral ePLND performed by two different experienced surgeons. One of the surgeons performed the peritoneal re-approximation (Group 1, n=41) and the other did not re-approximate the peritoneum (Group 2, n=38) at the end of the procedure in tRARP and ePLND. Operative parameters and symptomatic lymphocele rates were compared between the groups.

resultsThere were no significant differences between the preoperative parameters age, body mass index, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen values (p>0.05). The perioperative parameters were as follows: the operation time and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less, and the number of removed lymph nodes was higher in Group 2. However, only the difference in the EBL was statistically significant (p=0.03). Hospitalization time, symptomatic lymphocele, intervention requiring lymphocele, and complication rates were found to be less in Group 2, but only hospitalization time was statistically significant (p=0.04). Pathological parameters were similar for both groups. There was a significant correlation between lymph node positivity and the presence of symptomatic lymphocele in the correlation analysis (p=0.05).

conclusionIt has been shown in this study that the re-approximation of the peritoneum does not provide any additional benefit in terms of complications. Considering that this process also increases the operation time and lymphocele formation, we think there is no need for re-approximation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Identifiers

PMID32833618
PMCPMC7608535
OpenAlexW3081224402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.