ReviewThe CRISPR journal2020
Translating CRISPR-Cas Therapeutics: Approaches and Challenges.
Review in The CRISPR journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted Nanoparticle Delivery CRISPR/Cas9: overcoming biological barriers, enhancing stability, and improving therapeutic precision.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Miniaturized CRISPR: Ultra Compact Systems for In Vivo Delivery and Portable Diagnostics.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Genetic Interruption of PD-1/PD-L1 as an Alternative Means for Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: A Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Exosome-like nanovesicles from acerola for CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery to the central nervous system.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- From mechanism to medicine: CRISPR‒Cas9 delivery strategies, therapeutic applications and translation challenges.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Physical stimuli-responsive CRISPR-Cas9 systems for spatiotemporally precise control of genome engineering.Theranostics · 2026Review
- A novel minimally humanized mouse model of aniridia for preclinical evaluation of CRISPR gene editing strategies.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Article
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- ADARs: pleiotropy in function, versatility in application.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
- Identification of a subpopulation of highly adherent endothelial cells for seeding synthetic vascular grafts.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- The CRISPR-Cas revolution in head and neck cancer: a new era of targeted therapy.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Ultrasound Control of Genomic Regulatory Toolboxes for Cancer Immunotherapy.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Next-generation CRISPR technology for genome, epigenome and mitochondrial editing.Transgenic research · 2024Review
- CRISPR, CAR-T, and NK: Current applications and future perspectives.Genes & diseases · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing inHuman gene therapy · 2024Article
- Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Intracellular Protein Delivery: Approaches, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.BME frontiers · 2024Review
- Gene editing in small and large animals for translational medicine: a review.Animal reproduction · 2024Review
- ABE8e Corrects Pax6-Aniridic Variant in Humanized Mouse ESCs and via LNPs in Ex Vivo Cortical Neurons.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Tissue-Specific In Vivo Targeting: Nanomaterials and Translational Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas clinical trials have begun, offering a first glimpse at how DNA and RNA targeting could enable therapies for many genetic and epigenetic human diseases. The speedy progress of CRISPR-Cas from discovery and adoption to clinical use is built on decades of traditional gene therapy research and belies the multiple challenges that could derail the successful translation of these new modalities. Here, we review how CRISPR-Cas therapeutics are translated from technological systems to therapeutic modalities, paying particular attention to the therapeutic cascade from cargo to delivery vector, manufacturing, administration, pipelines, safety, and therapeutic target profiles. We also explore potential solutions to some of the obstacles facing successful CRISPR-Cas translation. We hope to illuminate how CRISPR-Cas is brought from the academic bench toward use in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.