Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833481›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2020

Episodic future thinking, delay discounting, and exercise during weight loss maintenance: The PACE trial.

Tricia M Leahey, Amy A Gorin, Emily Wyckoff, Zeely Denmat, Kayla O'Connor, Christiana Field, Genevieve F Dunton, John Gunstad, Tania B Huedo-Medina, Carnisha Gilder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Obesity and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tricia M LeaheyInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-3838
Amy A GorinInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Emily WyckoffInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Zeely DenmatInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut.
Kayla O'ConnorInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut.
Christiana FieldInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut.
Genevieve F DuntonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California.
John GunstadDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University.
Tania B Huedo-MedinaInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, and Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Carnisha GilderInstitute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, and Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut.

Funding

Is long-term maintenance worth the wait? Using real time data capture to examine delayed discounting as a putative target of physical activity adherence in weight loss maintenance interventionsR21NR018359 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GORIN, AMY A, LEAHEY, TRICIA M · 2018 to 2019
$441k
National Institutes of Health; Science of Behavior Change Common Fund ProgramNINR NIH HHS R21 NR018359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWeight loss maintenance (WLM) is the next major challenge in obesity treatment. While most individuals who lose weight intend to keep their weight off, weight regain is common. Temporal Self-Regulation Theory posits that whether intentions lead to behavior depends on self-regulatory capacity, including delay discounting (DD; the tendency to discount a larger future reward in favor of a smaller immediate reward). Episodic Future Thinking (EFT; mental imagery of a future event for which a health goal is important) may improve DD and promote behavior change. Described herein is a trial protocol designed to examine whether EFT improves DD within the context of weight loss maintenance.

methodParticipants who lose ≥5% of initial body weight in an online behavioral weight loss intervention will be randomly assigned to a standard weight loss maintenance program (WLM-STD) or a weight loss maintenance program plus EFT (WLM + EFT). Both interventions involve periodic phone and in-person treatment sessions. Participants in WLM + EFT will engage in daily EFT training via smartphone. To control for contact, participants in WLM-STD will engage in daily Healthy Thinking (reviewing strategies for weight management) on their smartphone. Our primary hypothesis is that WLM + EFT will yield better improvements in DD compared to WLM-STD. We will also explore whether DD mediates the relationship between intervention allocation and physical activity (secondary outcome). Weight and contextual variables will be explored.

conclusionsThis study is the first to test whether EFT improves DD within the context of weight loss maintenance; results from this experimental medicine approach could have important implications for understanding the impact of both EFT and DD on sustained behavior change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentAdultAgedDelay DiscountingExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThinkingWeight Reduction ProgramsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32833481
PMCPMC8344362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.