Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833160›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2020

Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users.

François Guérit, Jeremy Marozeau, Bastian Epp, Robert P Carlyon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

François GuéritHearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 352 Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. francois.guerit@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-3575
Jeremy MarozeauHearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 352 Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Bastian EppHearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 352 Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Robert P CarlyonCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBØrsted (Denmark) · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of the relative timing between pairs of same-polarity monophasic pulses has been studied extensively in single-neuron animal studies and has revealed fundamental properties of the neurons. For human cochlear implant listeners, the requirement to use charge-balanced stimulation and the typical use of symmetric, biphasic pulses limits such measures, because currents of opposite polarities interact at the level of the neural membrane. Here, we propose a paradigm to study same-polarity summation of currents while keeping the stimulation charge-balanced within a short time window. We used pairs of mirrored pseudo-monophasic pulses (a long-low phase followed by a short-high phase for the first pulse and a short-high phase followed by a long-low phase for the second pulse). We assumed that most of the excitation would stem from the two adjacent short-high phases, which had the same polarity. The inter-pulse interval between the short-high phases was varied from 0 to 345 μs. The inter-pulse interval had a significant effect on the perceived loudness, and this effect was consistent with both passive (membrane-related) and active (ion-channel-related) neuronal mechanisms contributing to facilitation. Furthermore, the effect of interval interacted with the polarity of the pulse pairs. At threshold, there was an effect of polarity, but, surprisingly, no effect of interval nor an interaction between the two factors. We discuss possible peripheral origins of these results.

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdCochlear ImplantsLoudness PerceptionAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedCochlear implantsFacilitationInter-phase gapInter-pulse intervalPolarity

Identifiers

PMID32833160
PMCPMC7644659
OpenAlexW3080441434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.