Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833115›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021

[Visual acuity in German preschool children-results of a cross-sectional study].

Heike M Elflein, Roman Pokora, Denis Müller, Alexander K Schuster, Klaus Jahn, Katharina A Ponto, Susanne Pitz, Norbert Pfeiffer, Michael S Urschitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heike M ElfleinAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. heike.elflein@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-6438
Roman PokoraAbteilung für Pädiatrische Epidemiologie, Institut für Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Denis MüllerAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Alexander K SchusterAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Klaus JahnAbteilung für Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst, Hygiene und Infektionsschutz, Ministerium für Soziales, Arbeit, Gesundheit und Demographie des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Katharina A PontoAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Susanne PitzAugenklinik, Bürgerhospital und Clementine Kinderhospital, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland.
Norbert PfeifferAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Michael S UrschitzAbteilung für Pädiatrische Epidemiologie, Institut für Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin the framework of the German pediatric screening examinations, the checks include visual functions. There is no ophthalmological screening examination in childhood in Germany. This study investigated whether participation in the pediatric screening examinations U8 (at the end of the fourth year of life) and U9 (at the beginning of the sixth year of life) is associated with the results of visual acuity, which are compiled at the school entry examinations (SEU).

methodsThis study evaluated data of the SEU for school the enrollment years 2009/2010-2014/2015 of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In these years visual acuity was assessed using the Rodenstock visual testing device (E-hooks; Rodenstock intruments GmbH, Ottobrunn, Deutschland) wearing glasses if present. The association between participation in the U8 and U9 screening examinations and the presence of unilateral and bilateral visual acuity <0.7 was investigated using multiple logistic regression adjusted for important disturbance variables.

resultsData from 189,704 children (91,041 girls, 98,663 boys) from 35 out of 36 districts were included. A visual acuity <0.7 was measured in 8416 (4.4%) children and in both eyes in 4345 (2.3%) children. The participation rates in the U8 and U9 were 93.9% and 93.3%, respectively. There was a negative association between participation in the U8 and U9 and a unilateral or bilateral SEU visual acuity <0.7 (adjusted odds ratio, OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.61-0.75; p < 0.01, N = 124,467/adjusted OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.65; p < 0.01, N = 121,496).

conclusionThe proportion of children with visual acuity <0.7 at the SEU was high. Children who were examined in the U8 and U9 had a better chance for a good visual acuity in the school entry examination.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVision ScreeningChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEyeglassesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleVision TestsVisual AcuityAmblyopiaChildhoodPediatric screening examinationRhineland-PalatinateSchool entry examination

Identifiers

PMID32833115
PMCPMC8105213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.