Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833114›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020

[Wound healing following amniotic membrane, limbal stem cell and corneal transplantation].

E M Messmer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

E M MessmerAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland. emessmer@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of wound healing processes involved in amniotic membrane, limbal stem cell and corneal transplantation enables an assessment of clinical findings and a targeted treatment. The amniotic membrane serves as a basal membrane substrate or temporary transplant in corneal epithelial wound healing. It has an anti-inflammatory effect, supports corneal wound healing and counteracts scar formation. Amniotic membranes are integrated intraepithelially, subepithelially, or intrastromally in the course of healing. Limbal epithelial stem cells express multiple genes necessary for corneal wound healing. The rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y‑27632 can improve the proliferation of limbal epithelial cells and therefore represents a new therapeutic option for limbal stem cell deficiency. Wound healing following penetrating keratoplasty involves fibroblasts, type III and IV collagens, proteoglycans, and chondroitin-6-sulfate. A certain inflammatory reaction seems to be necessary for final corneal wound closure.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationEpithelium, CornealLimbus CorneaeAmnionCell TransplantationHumansStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationWound HealingAmniotic membraneKeratoplastyLimbal epithelial cellsLimbal stem cell deficiencyLimbal stem cell transplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.