ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020
What is an estimand & how does it relate to quantifying the effect of treatment on patient-reported quality of life outcomes in clinical trials?
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06567340 (StratCare Trial 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
StratCare Trial 2: Evaluating the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of AI-driven Stratified Care for Depression
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of the dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide for weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2023 · on this mapPooled it
- Evaluating how clear the questions being investigated in randomised trials are: systematic review of estimands.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Estimands for factorial trials.Statistics in medicine · 2022Trial
- Article
- Patient and public involvement and engagement in target trial emulation framework: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Building Hybrid Pharmacometric-Machine Learning Models in Oncology Drug Development: Current State and Recommendations.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review of Recent Pharmacoepidemiologic Post-Market Safety Studies Through the Lens of the Estimand Framework.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Review
- A scoping review of statistical methods used to report EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores measured longitudinally.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Marital status and risk of cardiovascular disease - a multi-analyst study in epidemiology.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Best practices and pragmatic approaches for patient-reported outcomes and quality of life measures in cancer clinical trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025Article
- Time to deterioration of patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer clinical trials: targeted literature review and best practice recommendations.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Review
- Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials: A simulation study.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Article
- Decentralized Clinical Trials: Scientific Considerations Through the Lens of the Estimand Framework.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- A European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation for requiring a context-of-use statement for successful development and validation of biomarker assays.Bioanalysis · 2024Article
- End points in clinical trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: time for more dialogue?Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Eliminating Ambiguous Treatment Effects Using Estimands.American journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- The impact of clinical and translational research on the quality of life during the metastatic colorectal cancer patient journey.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublished in 2019, a new addendum to the ICH E9 guideline presents the estimand framework as a systematic approach to ensure alignment among clinical trial objectives, trial execution/conduct, statistical analyses, and interpretation of results. The use of the estimand framework for describing clinical trial objectives has yet to be extensively considered in the context of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We discuss the application of the estimand framework to PRO objectives when designing clinical trials in the future, with a focus on PRO outcomes in oncology trial settings as our example. MAIN: We describe the components of an estimand and take a naïve PRO trial objective to illustrate how to apply attributes described in the estimand framework to inform construction of a detailed clinical trial objective and its related estimand. We discuss identifying potential post-randomization events that alter the interpretation of the endpoint or render its observation impossible (also defined as intercurrent events) in the context of PRO endpoints, and the implications of how to handle intercurrent events in the construction of the PRO objective. Using a simple objective statement, "What is the effect of treatment X on patient's quality of life?", we build up an example estimand statement and also use a previously published phase III oncology clinical trial to illustrate how an estimand for a PRO objective could have been written to align to the estimate framework.
conclusionThe use of the estimand framework, as described in the new ICH E9 (R1) addendum guideline will become a key common framework for developing clinical trial objectives for evaluating effects of treatment. In the context of considering PROs, the framework provides an opportunity to more precisely specify and build the rationale for patient-focused objectives. This will help to ensure that clinical trials used for registration are designed and analysed appropriately, enabling all stakeholders to accurately interpret conclusions about the treatment effects for patient-focused outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.