Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833065›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2020

Microbiome and metabolic changes in milk in response to artemisinin supplementation in dairy cows.

Kun Hou, Jinjin Tong, Hua Zhang, Shan Gao, Yuqin Guo, Hui Niu, Benhai Xiong, Linshu Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Probiotic Dairy Innovations: Exploring Buffalo Milk Potential for Food Product Development.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun HouBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5113-1674
Jinjin TongBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China. tongjinjin0451@163.com.
Hua ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China.
Shan GaoBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China.
Yuqin GuoBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China.
Hui NiuBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China.
Benhai XiongState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Linshu JiangBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, 102206, People's Republic of China. jls@bac.edu.cn.
Beijing University of Agriculture · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31702302National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772629National Natural Science Foundation of China 31802091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of artemisinin (ART) on the milk microbiome and metabolites of dairy cow. A total of 12 mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows with similar parity, days in milk were randomly divided into 2 groups receiving either a total mixed ration (TMR) as the control group or this TMR and 120 g/d/head ART as the ART group. The milk samples were collected weekly to determine the contents, and end-of-trial (week 8) milk samples were used to identify microbial species and metabolite profiles by 16S rRNA sequencing and LC-MS analyses, respectively. We observed that the milk fat content significantly increased by ART treatment (P < 0.05). The bacterial community richness was significantly lower in the ART group (P < 0.05), while the diversity showed no difference (P > 0.05). Compared with its abundance in the control (CON) group, Firmicutes was significantly decreased, whereas Proteobacteria was significantly increased. Furthermore, in the ART group, the relative abundances of the genera Aerococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium_1 and Facklamia were significantly lower (P < 0.01). Metabolomics analysis revealed that ART significantly increasing the concentrations of glycerophospholipids, glycerolipids and flavonoids compared with those in the CON group. An enrichment analysis of the different metabolites showed that ART mainly affected glycerophospholipid metabolism and the pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis pathways. These findings revealed that ART supplementation could affect the milk microbiota and metabolites, that glycerophospholipids and glycerolipids could be potential biomarkers in the milk response to ART feed in dairy cows, and that ART changes substances in milk by maintaining lipid metabolism in the mammary gland.

Indexed as

ArtemisininDairy cowsMetabolomicsMicrobiomeMilk

Identifiers

PMID32833065
PMCPMC7445214
OpenAlexW3080433471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.