Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32833018›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2020

Evaluation of 1-Year vs Shorter Durations of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Among Patients With Early Breast Cancer: An Individual Participant Data and Trial-Level Meta-analysis.

Seema Gulia, Sadhana Kannan, Rajendra Badwe, Sudeep Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeting HER2 in breast cancer: new drugs and paradigms on the horizon.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seema GuliaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sadhana KannanDepartment of Biostatistics, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Rajendra BadweDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sudeep GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The optimum duration of adjuvant trastuzumab among patients with early breast cancer is uncertain but of great therapeutic relevance. Objective: To compare shorter durations with 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with early breast cancer. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and conference proceedings were searched from January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2019, for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Study Selection: To be eligible, the trial had to be randomized, compare a shorter duration with 1 year of trastuzumab as adjuvant treatment, and include patients with early breast cancer. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Individual patient data for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted from published survival curves of included RCTs; DFS and OS curves for each trial and the combined population were reconstructed. The DFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from the reconstructed survival curves as well as published estimates. The HR for DFS was used to test noninferiority using the median noninferiority margin of eligible RCTs. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was DFS; OS and cardiac toxic effects were secondary outcomes. Results: There were 6 eligible RCTs with a median DFS noninferiority margin of 1.3 (range, 1.15-1.53), 5 of which had extractable individual patient data for 11 376 patients, 1659 DFS events, and 871 deaths. For shorter duration vs 1 year of trastuzumab, the 5-year DFS was 85.42% (95% CI, 84.41%-86.38%) vs 87.12% (95% CI, 86.15%-88.02%) (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.25, 1-sided P for noninferiority = .004), and OS was 92.39% (95% CI, 91.61%-93.10%) vs 93.46% (95% CI, 92.73%-94.13%) (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33). Using trial-level published estimates from 6 RCTs, including 11 603 patients, 1760 DFS events, and 930 deaths, the HR for DFS was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.26; 1-sided P for noninferiority = .002) and, for OS, 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.33). There was significantly less risk of congestive heart failure with shorter-duration trastuzumab (relative risk, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.74). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab was noninferior to its 1-year administration and resulted in lower rates of cardiac toxic effects. These results suggest that a shorter duration may be the preferred option for patients with low-risk disease or a predisposition to cardiac toxic effects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHeart FailureHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID32833018
PMCPMC7445596
OpenAlexW3080424876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.