Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832998›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2020

Evaluation of Linear Growth at Higher Altitudes.

Kaleab Baye, Kalle Hirvonen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaleab BayeAddis Ababa University, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Center for Food Science and Nutrition, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kalle HirvonenInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Development Strategy and Governance Division, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Irrespective of their genetic makeup, children living in an ideal home environment that supports healthy growth have similar growth potential. However, whether this potential is true for children residing at higher altitudes remains unknown. Objective: To investigate whether altitude is associated with increased risk of linear growth faltering and evaluate the implications associated with the use of the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards, which have not been validated for populations residing 1500 m above sea level. Design, Settings, and Participants: Analysis of 133 nationally representative demographic and health cross-sectional surveys administered in 59 low- and middle-income countries using local polynomial and multivariate regression was conducted. A total of 964 299 height records from 96 552 clusters at altitudes ranging from -372 to 5951 m above sea level were included. Demographic and Health Surveys were conducted between 1992 and 2018. Exposures: Residence at higher altitudes, above and below 1500 m above sea level, and in ideal home environments (eg, access to safe water, sanitation, and health care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was child linear growth deficits expressed in length-for-age/height-for-age z scores (HAZ). Associations between altitude and height among all children and those residing in ideal home environments were assessed. Child growth trajectories above and below 1500 m above sea level were compared and the altitude-mediated height deficits were estimated using multivariable linear regression. Results: In 2010, a total of 842 million people in the global population (approximately 12%) lived 1500 m above sea level or higher, with 67% in Asia and Africa. Eleven percent of the sample was children who resided 1500 m above sea level or higher. These children were born at shorter length and remained on a lower growth trajectory than children residing in areas less than 1500 m above sea level. The negative association between altitude and HAZ was approximately linear through most part of the altitude distribution, indicating no clear threshold for an abrupt decrease in HAZ. A 1000-m above sea level increase in altitude was associated with a 0.163-unit (95% CI, -0.205 to -0.120 units) decrease in HAZ after adjusting for common risk factors using multivariable linear regressions. The HAZ distribution of children residing in ideal home environments was similar to the 2006 World Health Organization HAZ distribution, but only up to 500 m above sea level. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that residing at a higher altitude may be associated with child growth slowing even for children living in ideal home environments. Interventions addressing altitude-mediated growth restrictions during pregnancy and early childhood should be identified and implemented.

Indexed as

AltitudeBody HeightChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32832998
PMCPMC7445632
OpenAlexW3081095155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.