ArticleThe ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments2020
Motor Cortex Mapping using Active Gaussian Processes.
Article in The ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient Gaussian process-based motor hotspot hunting with concurrent optimization of TMS coil location and orientation.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Examining the feasibility and utility of heart rate variability on intervention outcomes targeting emotion regulation in autism: a brief report.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Similarity of hand muscle synergies elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and those found during voluntary movement.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Efficient TMS-Based Motor Cortex Mapping Using Gaussian Process Active Learning.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One important application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is to map cortical motor topography by spatially sampling the motor cortex, and recording motor evoked potentials (MEP) with surface electromyography. Standard approaches to TMS mapping involve repetitive stimulations at different loci spaced on a (typically 1 cm) grid on the scalp. These mappings strategies are time consuming and responsive sites are typically sparse. Furthermore, the long time scale prevents measurement of transient cortical changes, and is poorly tolerated in clinical populations. An alternative approach involves using the TMS mapper expertise to exploit the map's sparsity through the use of feedback of MEPs to decide which loci to stimulate. In this investigation, we propose a novel active learning method to automatically infer optimal future stimulus loci in place of user expertise. Specifically, we propose an active Gaussian Process (GP) strategy with loci selection criteria such as entropy and mutual information (MI). The proposed method twists the usual entropy- and MI-based selection criteria by modeling the estimated MEP field, i.e., the GP mean, as a Gaussian random variable itself. By doing so, we include MEP amplitudes in the loci selection criteria which would be otherwise completely independent of the MEP values. Experimental results using real data shows that the proposed strategy can greatly outperform competing methods when the MEP variations are mostly conned in a sub-region of the space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.