Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832934›Full record

ArticleThe ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments2020

Motor Cortex Mapping using Active Gaussian Processes.

Razieh Faghihpirayesh, Tales Imbiriba, Mathew Yarossi, Eugene Tunik, Dana Brooks, Deniz Erdoğmuş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments : PETRA ... International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficient TMS-Based Motor Cortex Mapping Using Gaussian Process Active Learning.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Razieh FaghihpirayeshECE, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tales ImbiribaECE, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mathew YarossiPTRMS, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eugene TunikPTRMS, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dana BrooksECE, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deniz ErdoğmuşECE, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Translational refinement of adaptive communication system for locked-in patientsR01DC009834 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED-OKEN, MELANIE · 2009 to 2024
$12.5M
Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual EnvironmentsR01HD058301 · NICHD · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, MERIANS, ALMA S · 2009 to 2021
$4.7M
Planning and Updating in Frontoparietal Networks for GraspingR01NS085122 · NINDS · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, TUNIK, EUGENE · 2014 to 2025
$3.2M
SCH: INT: Collaborative Research: Multimodal Signal Analysis and Data Fusion for Post-traumatic EpilepsyR01NS111744 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUNCAN, DOMINIQUE, ERDOGMUS, DENIZ · 2019 to 2022
$981k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058301NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009834NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085122NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One important application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is to map cortical motor topography by spatially sampling the motor cortex, and recording motor evoked potentials (MEP) with surface electromyography. Standard approaches to TMS mapping involve repetitive stimulations at different loci spaced on a (typically 1 cm) grid on the scalp. These mappings strategies are time consuming and responsive sites are typically sparse. Furthermore, the long time scale prevents measurement of transient cortical changes, and is poorly tolerated in clinical populations. An alternative approach involves using the TMS mapper expertise to exploit the map's sparsity through the use of feedback of MEPs to decide which loci to stimulate. In this investigation, we propose a novel active learning method to automatically infer optimal future stimulus loci in place of user expertise. Specifically, we propose an active Gaussian Process (GP) strategy with loci selection criteria such as entropy and mutual information (MI). The proposed method twists the usual entropy- and MI-based selection criteria by modeling the estimated MEP field, i.e., the GP mean, as a Gaussian random variable itself. By doing so, we include MEP amplitudes in the loci selection criteria which would be otherwise completely independent of the MEP values. Experimental results using real data shows that the proposed strategy can greatly outperform competing methods when the MEP variations are mostly conned in a sub-region of the space.

Indexed as

Active LearningGaussian ProcessMotor CortexMotor Evoked PotentialsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32832934
PMCPMC7433704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.