ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2020
Development and validation of a curriculum for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveTo develop and validate a three-step curriculum for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) designed for a busy clinical setting. NETHODS: Single-centre, prospective, cohort study. Twelve eligible gynaecological trainees were included (group 1). The theoretical part (step 1) was a validated multiple-choice test. The practical part (step 2) consisted of five tasks on a virtual reality simulator. The participants had to reach a pre-defined proficiency level before advancing to performing a LSH (step 3). The validation of the curriculum was based on the surgical performance. The surgical procedure was recorded and assessed by two experts using Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) and Competence Assessment Tool - Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (CAT-LSH). The scores were compared with scores from gynaecological trainees who performed their first LSH without virtual reality simulator training (group 2).
resultsTen trainees completed the curriculum and performed a LSH that was recorded and evaluated. Mean duration of the training period (step 1 and 2) was 57 days (SD 26.0), and mean training time spent on the simulator to reach the pre-set proficiency level was 173 min (SD 49). The mean GOALS score was 18.5 (SD 5.8) in group 1 and 13.6 (SD 3.3) in group 2, p=0.027. The mean CAT-LSH score of the performance of the hysterectomy was 42.1 (SD 6.9) in group 1 and 34.8 (SD 4.3) in group 2, p= 0.009.
conclusionsTrainees who completed the curriculum appeared to have a higher performance score compared with trainees who did not perform structured training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32832922PMC7431195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.