ArticleACS applied bio materials2020
In Situ 3D-Printing using a Bio-ink of Protein-photosensitizer Conjugates for Single-cell Manipulation.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conductive Biocomposite Made by Two-Photon Polymerization of Hydrogels Based on BSA and Carbon Nanotubes with Eosin-Y.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing in Cancer Therapy and Diagnostics: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- [Research progress ofZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Living tissues dynamically modulate their structure and functions through physical and biochemical interactions in the three-dimensional (3D)-microenvironment for their homeostasis or the developmental process of an embryo. However, the manipulation of cellular functions in vitro is still challenging due to the lack of a dynamic material system that can vary the 3D-cellular microenvironment in time and space. Here, we show an in situ 3D-printing technique based on multiphoton lithography using a biocompatible photoresist, bio-ink. The bio-ink composed of protein-photosensitizer conjugates has the ability to cause singlet oxygen and cross-linking reaction to fabricate protein gels with submicrometer-scale precision. Remarkably, the conjugates substantially improve the cytocompatibility and the efficiency of gelation due to the stealth effect of rose bengal (RB) and efficient transfer of singlet oxygen to bovine serum albumin (BSA). 3D-printing in the presence of cells allows for the microfabrication of a protein scaffold and controlled single-cell behavior. This dynamic material system to direct cell fate may offer emerging applications for drug discovery and regenerative medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.