Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832874›Full record

ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2020

Using Esterase Selectivity to Determine the

Jillian G Baker, Christophe Fromont, Marjorie Bruder, Kevin S J Thompson, Barrie Kellam, Stephen J Hill, Sheila M Gardiner, Peter M Fischer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian G BakerCell Signalling Research Group, Division of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, U.K.
Christophe FromontSchool of Pharmacy and Centre for Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, U.K.
Marjorie BruderCentre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors, University of Birmingham and University of Nottingham, The Midlands, U.K.
Kevin S J ThompsonCell Signalling Research Group, Division of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, U.K.
Barrie KellamCentre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors, University of Birmingham and University of Nottingham, The Midlands, U.K.
Stephen J HillCell Signalling Research Group, Division of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, U.K.
Sheila M GardinerCell Signalling Research Group, Division of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, U.K.
Peter M FischerCentre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors, University of Birmingham and University of Nottingham, The Midlands, U.K.
University of Nottingham · GBWest Midlands Deanery · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For disorders of the skin, eyes, ears, and respiratory tract, topical drugs, delivered directly to the target organ, are a therapeutic option. Compared with systemic oral therapy, the benefits of topical treatments include a faster onset of action, circumventing the liver first pass drug metabolism, and reducing systemic side effects. Nevertheless, some systemic absorption still occurs for many topical agents resulting in systemic side effects. One way to prevent these would be to develop drugs that are instantly degraded upon entry into the bloodstream by serum esterases. Because topical β-blockers are used in glaucoma and infantile hemeangioma and cause systemic side effects, the β-adrenoceptor system was used to test this hypothesis. Purified liver esterase reduced the apparent affinity of esmolol, an ester-containing β-blocker used in clinical emergencies, for the human β-adrenoceptors in a concentration and time-dependent manner. However, purified serum esterase had no effect on esmolol. Novel ester-containing β-blockers were synthesized and several were sensitive to both liver and serum esterases. Despite good

Identifiers

PMID32832874
PMCPMC7432666
OpenAlexW3038295886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.